FreedomAdvocate

I know for a fact that it’s literally being limited by not allowing it to be read or seen

How do you know this? If you can't see it or read it, how do you know this?

And you said it yourself, it’s being treated differently by preventing its diffusion and visibility.

That isn't censorship.

Or tell me, why is a neutral word like cisgender being censored at all? But spare me the gaslighting.

Again - it's not being censored. You don't get posts removed for saying it. You don't get banned. The term is a controversial one, it's not "neutral". "Cisgender" has no need to even exist as a word. You don't need a word to mean "not trans", which is 99.99% of the population. The word "transgender" existing negates a need for "cisgender" to exist. "Cisgender" is really only ever used as an insult, which is why it's treated as such. There's no word for "not blind", because not being blind is the default, the standard.

First, don’t fall into the trap of confusing censorship with moderation.

It's funny you say that. Moderation that removes all differing opinions, and bans people who express them, is censorship. Limiting the reach of posts deemed "hateful", while not removing them or banning the person posting them, is not censorship.

But there are "dissenting views" all over X? Pro-Democrat policy and ideology views are not censored. Pro Trans/Palestine/Abortion/every-other-left-wing views are not being censored.

Which views are being censored on X in America? What evidence do you have to support your claim?

They operate within the law. If a government says you either ban an account in their country or you stop providing your service to the entire country, which do you think X should do? Because those are the options - follow the law or exit the country.

X are challenging the government legal orders in court btw, but in the meantime they have to cooperate. Like I said, the government are the ones censoring free speech here, not X. Do you not see the difference? To operate in a country you need to follow their laws. Not every country has free speech constitutionally guaranteed btw.

Do you think they should classify the “n word” as a slur and limit its reach? Is that censorship?

Cis isn’t being blocked from being seen or read.

It’s fucking unreal just how completely lost you magats are. Just fucking upside down in relation to any sort of reality.

This is just too hilarious. The people that are completely out of touch with reality are people like you who say things like this.

Not trolling at all, just have different opinions to the echo chamber.

Clearly, because even that article is bullshit and couldn't find 10 despite naming it "Elon Musk, King of Censorship: 10 Times the ‘Free Speech Absolutist’ Silenced Twitter Users" lol

Government ordered takedowns are not Twitter censoring people - it's the government.

As for "cis" and "cisgender" - they're considered slurs on there, but they're not censored. You can go on there and post "cisgender" as much as you want.

Because I can be. The fact that someone being on here with differing opinions upsets so many people is just a bonus.

That's not censorship. You can still post with that word and it doesn't get deleted. It just won't get spread as far and wide. All your followers etc will still see it.

Because Twitter is the only social media site that isn’t a highly censored echo chamber.