FreedomAdvocate

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

The position that what Israel are doing is a genocide is the sticking point, and one that is highly contested. I don’t believe that what they’re doing is, because they’re not trying to erase an entire national or ethnic group - just Hamas.

I’m not alone in thinking this, but I’m expecting I’ll be banned for saying it with how Lemmy is.

Hamas literally outright call for the genocide of Jews and Israelis btw. Hamas NEED to be eliminated, and the only ones who disagree are people who agree with their calls for genocide.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Ok so you agree that Sony shouldn’t have to let you install and play anything you want on their console, but Apple needs to be different because…….reasons? Reasons that you can’t articulate.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What are the “arguably bad business practices” here? I would argue that Epic pissing off the manufacturer of the most popular phones in the world, which have over 90% of all in-app purchase $$$$ spent in the mobile world, is bad business practice - not even arguably.

As for anything “benefiting me”……am I not allowed an opinion or to express it unless it’s echo chamber aligned? Is it only allowed if it ignores all logic and is just mindless anger against [insert big corporation name here]?

I’m giving context to the situation.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wasn’t “licking big corporate boot” in the first place. I said that epic have no one but themselves to blame, which is true. I said if epic did to me what they did to Apple, I’d tell them to get fucked if they ever tried to put stuff on my store again.

No bootlicking at all, but that doesn’t stop some losers from throwing out the term because they hate company X. Apple built a product, and they’re entitled to make it a closed ecosystem. We, as consumers, are entitled to not buy or use their products if we don’t like them, their policies, etc.

People vote with their wallets, and unfortunately for the Apple haters, the votes keep coming up Apple no matter how many recounts there are. Android is right there as an alternative and lets you do basically whatever you want with it, yet outside of third world countries the iPhone rules the roost.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course not.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 1 year ago

Each user gets 1TB on Business Basic.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google did it first according to the article, that’s why this non-profit moved to MS.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

What exactly does Linux offer that M365 does? Linux is an operating system, not a full suite of business management software.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

LibreOffice is not a replacement for M365 though, it’s a replacement for Office. M365 is not just office.

LibreOffice doesn’t give every user 1TB of cloud storage space. It doesn’t give you a company email address and management tools for users. It doesn’t give you 95% of what M365 does.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago

I work for a company that does 10s of billions in revenue, and the finance departments all use excel as well. Pretty much every giant corporations finance departments use excel.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 1 year ago

The article clearly states that this non-profit moved from Google to Microsoft after Google started charging lol

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago

Outlook alternatives are irrelevant when you don’t have your own email address. Microsoft 365 gives your company your corporate email.

view more: ‹ prev next ›