FreedomAdvocate

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

It says based on the words of some guy who used to go to Harvard, the government no longer trusts Harvard nor thinks Harvard provides anything

This is using a single customer review to force political teachings they want by withholding unrelated funds.

It says no such thing. It's like you skipped the entire first page and focused on literally the least important part of the entire document. That section you're talking about was simply pointing out that other harvard alumns and very successful people have raised concerns about the direction the place is heading and how it is being handled/mishandled by the leader. That persons "review" wasn't what made this decision. It played no part in it. Harvards actions caused this decision.

It never gave any proof of it not currently trying to comply with laws and court decisions, as that would require the judicial branch or third party input/audits.

The letter never gave any proof? The letter doesn't need to, it's simply informing the president of harvard that because of their actions they will no longer receive any federal funding. This letter isn't a court case. Harvard have openly said that they're not going to comply with the laws: https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2025/04/harvard-wont-comply-with-demands-from-trump-administration/

The only ones to blame for Harvard losing their federal funding are Harvard themselves. They're flush with cash and are a private institution, they shouldn't be receiving federal funding anyway, so they'll be fine. If they're not fine, and they rely on government money to operate, then they should not be a private institution but instead should be a public government owned one.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Not really applicable here though. Can you use a terrible keyboard on an 8" screen? Absolutely. Can you use a much better keyboard on a much better screen the same size or smaller/bigger on preference by using a more common device? Also yes.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Topics aren't banned, but certain sides opinions on topics are heavily moderated/censored.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago

It sounds like the idea is to bring in your ready to print files and load them up and just use the Surface to review and send it to the printer via the slicer? A surface would be fine for that, especially since they support keyboards and mice.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You didn't buy it intending to run VMs on it without checking that it could actually run VMs did you? haha

I get your point though - iPad Pros have absolutely killer hardware that is let down by iPadOS. I would own one of the latest ones if it ran MacOS.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago

Samsung screwed it up with Dex

What do you mean by this? Dex is pretty awesome.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (18 children)

I don't really see the point in low powered small devices like this, when something like an iPad/Galaxy Tab/eInk tablet is far better suited to the typical tasks you'd use them for.

view more: ‹ prev next ›