Ok so there's no point for me trying to continue this discussion with you as you clearly aren't arguing in good faith. See ya.
If you can't provide a single piece of evidence to support your argument no matter how many times you're asked, it's correct to assume it doesn't exist. Bye now :)
Is stealing a car punishable by a death sentence?
No, but pointing a loaded gun at a police officer while stealing a car is.
Is possessing a firearm punishable by a death sentence?
No, but pointing a loaded gun at a police officer while stealing a car is.
cops are not judge jury and executioner
They are in certain situations though, typically ones where suspected criminals - especially ones caught in the act - point guns at them. Every time they are there will be an investigation to determine if it was a lawful shooting, and if it isn't they will face consequences (though very often those consequences will NOT be harsh enough, but that's a different story).
There is a thing called due process.
There's a thing called obeying the law too, and this kid didn't follow that. "Due process", the flavour of the month for the left, believe it or not DOES include police shooting suspects to death in certain circumstances.
There is no proof the guy even had a gun.
You haven't seen it, though it reportedly exists. We'll see when the final reports come out.
The cop SAID he had one, and cops are well known for carrying around throw away guns, to plant on people after they have killed them.
Ok so you've jumped straight to "it's a conspiracy". Good for you, but the rest of us like to wait for actual evidence and "due process" to play out. It is currently being investigated. If it is proven that he did have a gun, what will you say then?
Show me a source. Wikipedia is not a source. Show me 1 specific example of a law that is “gay erasure” please. That’s not too much to ask, surely?
Last chance then I'll correctly assume that there are no sources on there that support the "gay erasure" argument.
why?
Why.....what? Why would they remove the information about programs that no longer exist? Because they no longer exist. The information is no longer relevant, and leaving it up would only cause confusion.
you don’t know what censure is, and no I’m not reporting you.
CenSURE and cenSOR are very different things. Are you claming that the removal of the DEI stuff from the government websites is censuring or censoring?
Show me a source. Wikipedia is not a source. Show me 1 specific example of a law that is “gay erasure” please. That’s not too much to ask, surely?
Uhuh and why is the administration calling his deportation an error?
They're not - they're saying that there was an administrative error on his paperwork. ie a typo, put something in the wrong box, etc. NOT that he shouldn't have been deported.
I don’t know… due process?
WHAT DUE PROCESS? He was ordered by 2 separate judges to be deported. He was there at those court cases. What due process did he not get? What specifically do you think should happen if he is brought back to the US for "due process" to happen? For a third judge to rule yes he is MS13 and yes he should be deported, like the first 2?
How was his deportation an error then?
It wasn't, as I said above.
Trumps insistence on the matter doesn’t make it true
Trump has nothing to do with it. Trump wasn't the one that insisted he was an MS13 member. Trump wasn't either one of the judges back in 2019 who determined that he was MS13.
Oh idk maybe because he deported in error?
He wasn't.
Show me a source. Wikipedia is not a source. Show me 1 specific example of a law that is "gay erasure" please. That's not too much to ask, surely?
It literally is when it’s targeting anyone but white men.
Removing outdated information from a website is censorship because it "targets" anyone but white men? What? The DEI programs no longer exist, so the government removed the information about the DEI programs. That makes sense no matter how you feel about the DEI programs ending. If it doesn't exist, you remove the info about it.
Are you trying to argue that ending DEI programs is "censorship"? That's an entirely different argument, and "censorship" isn't even remotely the right word for it.
Oh, you actually believe this?
Believe that you're just saying I'm "trolling" because you disagree with me? Yes, I believe that because that's what you're doing. You haven't shown any evidence of me "trolling" because I'm not. We're having a discussion, or at least I'm trying to. It seems to me like you're trying to get my opinion and views censored by calling them "trolling", and I'm assuming you're also reporting my comments as such too right?
And I'm saying that Wikipedia is not a source, and that I'm not going to go to a wikipedia page and then look for the specific source(s) that the person thinks proves their point when there could be 50 different articles linked on that page.
Show me a source for a LAW that the current US government has passed making it illegal to say that gay people exist. Go.
And he didn’t see them.
He didn't see what? That he was ordered to be deported? Yes he did - he actually showed up to those court dates back in 2019 lol.
It is a giant coincidence, because it actually means LDCB.
lol so first everyone says that they don't mean anything, now they suddenly mean "LDCB"? Took you guys a few weeks to find something else you can try and claim they mean lol. Also google is turning up a blank for anything with garcia and LDCB.
Also if he actually had a chance to see judge before being black bagged, at least it would be a little fair.
What exactly do you think he needs to see ANOTHER judge for though?
In the country illegally? Check Citizen of El Salvador and only El Salvador? Check Determined to be a MS13 gang member? Check
What exactly do you think another court case would possibly do that the previous ones didn't? Seriously - what "due process" do you think someone who was twice ordered to be deported and determined to be a gang member missed out on when he got deported?
The same people that ordered his deportation are not the same people ordering that they have to try and bring him back.
Trump wasn't the one that made the ruling that he was MS13. That was done by immigration and 2 separate judges 6 years ago, and then confirmed by the president of el salvador when he asked for him to be sent there. Trump was presenting the facts that he was ruled to be MS13 by 2 separate Judges and immigration.