And we’re back to the concept of that paradox being bullshit to begin with.
Sure, but it’ll be tens of billions of dollars over budget, and will take 10x as long as it was supposed to. And it won’t work.
Misleading. Some researchers found an unsecured database, contacted the owners, and they secured it. There is no evidence of the data actually being leaked.
So you agree that jailing someone for voicing their beliefs because you disagree with them is being intolerant?
lol
Typical attempt to shift blame from the fact that as the percentage of “renewables” in the grid increases, electricity prices increase. It’s not gas that’s making prices skyrocket. It’s not coal. It’s “renewables”.
OP wants remote streaming - that’s a no for jellyfin, especially for people who couldn’t handle the sonarr/radarr UI.
I’ll give this one a go, but I already use LunaSea and it’s fantastic.
Edit: oh it’s not on the App Store. No thanks.
And who decides what views are “intolerant”?
Bingo. Once you start policing words it’s a slippery slope to full on government authoritarian control.
Using words should almost never be a crime. That’s the point. These are fascist, authoritarian laws.
That concept is, pardon my French, complete bullshit.
Remember - you’re being intolerant of people who hold views you don’t like. Think what these laws mean when, not if, people with opposing views to you get in power.
No, they absolutely should not lol. Why should they?
No, they should not because the words didn’t kill anyone.
This is one of the few times they should be, and that’s because you’re legitimately causing direct negative consequences to someone else with said words.
Unless they actually attempt it then no, I don’t think that should be a crime.
Words are not violence. Words can’t hurt you. Anyone thinking they are and they can needs to toughen up.