FreedomAdvocate

joined 1 month ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not the person you commented on, but think about the reason why people are wanting SpaceX to be nationalised when NASA exists and is already Government owned.

SpaceX is light years, pardon the pun, ahead of NASA. If SpaceX was taken over by the government, SpaceX would likely end up like NASA as it would be taken over by the same people and have mountains more red tape in order to do anything. It would destroy SpaceX and put space exploration back decades.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then the UN should start their own starlink-like company. Nothing is stopping them.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

SpaceX and starlink have had very little success the last few years? What have you been smoking?!

[–] FreedomAdvocate -3 points 1 week ago (11 children)

You don’t nationalise a company (SpaceX) just because the existing government owned company (NASA) is significantly worse. What do you think would happen to SpaceX if they did nationalise it? Lol. It would go to hell, like NASA.

The government should not be responsible for things like this. The government should provide services for necessities for human rights and general standards of living, but they shouldn’t take over successful companies just because they couldn’t do it themselves.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Just because something is a “utility” it doesn’t mean that the government should own and run it lol.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

These things only exist and are as good as they are because they’re not government owned and run.

Look at NASA compared to SpaceX to see why this would be an absolutely terrible move. Government is where projects like these go to die, while making every politician and contractor involved filthy rich.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 3 points 1 week ago

YouTube didn’t publicly make that claim though, so they haven’t done any defamation.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 3 points 1 week ago

If you’re not playing on a VRR display 45fps *will * be horrible and stuttery. 30fps locked would feel significantly better.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Almost every person I’ve had an argument/discussion with who goes through my past comments to try and find things to use against me when they’re losing has been someone who goes back and deleted all of their comments. I don’t think that’s a coincidence.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 week ago

No, mostly because online games don’t have credits because you don’t “beat” them, but also because why on earth would I? What would I possibly get from it?

view more: ‹ prev next ›