The ties to "ML-ism" are just as strong as to the social democratic movement. So you can be of two minds here: either you say WGAF what the commies did to the term and go on using it. Or you say it's been historically so tainted you have to move on. I don't think there is a right answer. On top of this being not the most pressing concern of our age.
FriendOfDeSoto
When reached for comment, White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly told the Daily Beast in a statement, “It’s sad that Daily Beast interns cannot grasp the concept of pro-growth policies that create jobs. Their minds are clearly warped after cheering on Joe Biden as he wrecked our economy for four years.”
The pettiness is unreal.
You'd need your private data center, a video model, and skills with video models. I think all publicly available models don't do more than minutes at a time and will probably not accept fucking with copyrighted material. But if you ran your own operation you could probably do it in a month or so. You shouldn't though for a laugh because you'll be personally responsible for killing a polar bear family.
Gold in large quantities is still a bet. You're betting that society and the economy will collapse or suffer huge trauma, which will wipe out a lot of wealth. But you're also betting that the economy will come back alive soon enough because without it all you have is a heavy pile of metal. Gold is also not an easily transferable asset. In societal and economical collapse, gold is not as useful as stuff you need to stay alive. It also ties up a big amount of wealth in one item that may be difficult to separate into smaller currency to use on a black market. And if people know you have gold, even if everything is fine in your neck of the woods, you're a target for theft. Gold is a good idea if you don't know what to do with some of your second million in assets. But it would be inadvisable to put all your savings into it. Diversification is the answer.
Use the same country for the VPN as you're in. Same or neighboring state in the US. And then stay on that server. There is always a risk. I decided I would bail on the account if they ever wanted more from me. 2y in and knocking on wood.
Pixelfed is really a lean back experience so engagement will be lower. You can just go for a Mastodon account and you'll be able to promote it on Pixelfed; they will just miss out on all text only posts for the time being.
I have started running an Instagram account for a niche thing that after the heat death of Twitter shifted its attention to Insta. I was one of those insufferable Facebook leavers in the mid teens and had deleted my own FB and Insta accounts. So I created a new one. But I've never accessed it without a VPN. To get all the functions I'm running the app on an old phone under permanent, dead man switch VPN connection. And crucially it's a phone that never had Insta installed on it before when I was using it under my main driver account.
And I'm using it because the interaction is there. In the decade I wasn't on Insta it has turned to shit. And it's no longer the app to share pictures. If you want people who appreciate just good pictures, maybe try Pixelfed instead.
The web doesn't allow you to do all the things you can do on the app.
I don't think there was an -ism that fits this bill. Feudalism's end boss was enlightenment thinking and it had to play the level for a century before it could say it had beat it, at least feudalism in a traditional sense.
The commenter before me described the solution, give cops an override, as easy. I wanted to highlight that it isn't that easy. Unintended side effects ought to be considered before coming up with seemingly easy solutions. And this problem is not dissimilar to the one about encrypted chats and law enforcement wanting a backdoor into that. If you build a backdoor, it's not guaranteed that only the good guys use it. And that raises questions about privacy on the encryption front or questions about abuse, safety, and liability on the self-driving car front.
If you give police a backdoor to control self-driving cars, somebody is going (to hack it and) use it to kill somebody.
But can I tell you that - regardless of the content - this feels more like a blatant attempt at getting more YouTube views with a patreon link in tow?
Doctors can share the details of your genial warts as well as long as it doesn't become painfully clear they were taking about you. The same logic applies to therapists. They can share your story but not the fact that it is yours. And if they have a lot of patients they have a certain level of obscurity. And if they're clever they change a couple of things about the story to make it less obvious.
The distinction I would make here is the intent behind sharing the story. If it's a function of venting with other professionals, I get it. They're only human too. If it's meant as a sort of teachable moment to others present, I think that's alright. If it's a "get a load of this shit" story telling and I found out, I would change therapists.