KairuByte

joined 2 years ago
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago

All LLMs are AI, all AI is not an LLM.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

6GHz compatible devices are already being sold. If your phone is new-ish it likely supports it, and many routers already have it.

This isn’t a “next gen” problem, it’s a “current gen bleeding edge” problem.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 months ago

It’s like trading cards, gotta trade em all!

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Theoretically possible? Sure. Though I don’t trust the US government with this information either.

Then there a completely different problem to be concerned with: https://chinamediaproject.org/2025/06/04/chinas-slow-march-toward-cyber-ids/

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Lmao. Yeah, the government is going to implement this? Assuming it is actually secure, when do you expect this to release? A decade from now?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago (7 children)

How do you verify someone is 18 without your information?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago (9 children)

age restrictions *done properly (ie securely and privately)* are long overdue.

This does not exist.

It is claimed to exist, but you can’t name a single technology that guarantees security and privacy from the user to the source of the verification.

Are you willing to trust pornhub with your personal information? Xhamster? Kink.com? Motherless? Draft porn? PervertTube? And on, and on, and on.

You trust that every, single, individual, porn site is going to have both the know how, and scruples, to keep this data 100% secure and private?

Because I don’t even trust that a site can keep my credit card information private and secure, as has been shown to be a good bet over and over again despite there being a plethora of laws on how to handle such information.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago (11 children)

So it’s a scale problem for you? What number is acceptable?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 6 months ago (13 children)

Why does scale matter? If it was only 50k kids daily would it change your mind?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

They time traveled?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

Yea ngl that was my first question. This really does seem like it’s either grouping them together, or purely heat.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 months ago

Funny thing is, even if your skills were in the bracket for more human weighted matches, you’d not have hit them in your first few sessions. The first few matches are always 100% bots to give you a feeling for the game without the rick of being steam rolled by humans.

There’s also the problem of matches being 100 people and not starting until it hits about that number. Imagine the fun of sitting and waiting for 10 minutes for people to hop on.

view more: ‹ prev next ›