KeenFlame

Not really. I am talking about Facebook. They come from the states.

The corpos control your laws, narrative, everything and they are considered to be human. They are demonic entities of destruction and you are slaves to their unending urge to divide and ruin our race. To kill us as profits are easier to achieve when humans are out of the equation

Yeah more hateful and betraying humanity plotting to end the life of our entire planet. Stupid is such a small word

Yes fuck because a demonic data harvesting entity is not okay with humans. In our contry we do not have corpos deciding laws, it's also very illegal because corporations are not human and considered gods like in your empire. Hope this helps to explain

They are used to not having to respond to rules and laws and make more money than the fines take so it is a business as usual, and the reason is that "they" in this context is not human. It is an entity of raw unapologetic competitor for ending planet earth, an entity that strives only for profit and harvest any human in the way, even those inside it that help it. There exist no compassion or afterthought for if human lives are worth anything, instead if one of the zealot lawyers in its show any sign of not obeying they are replaced so that the giant demonic machine can ensure that every human inside it is currently doing their best to betray their own race. All the blood money from profits is available to use for this goal, but also the minds of humans that can strategically plant comments and enact articles like this, where they play off the political divide and wars and destruction of the planet. Only to distract even, they don't need anything but time until we die out so they can focus on profits more

There is definitely reason a larger model would have worse hallucinations. Why do you say not? It's a fundamental problem with data scaling in these architectures

Maybe I misunderstood, are you saying all hallucinations originate from the safety regression period? Because hallucinations appear in all architectures of current research, open models, even with clean curated data included. Fact checking itself works somewhat, but the confidence levels are off sometimes and if you crack that problem, please elaborate because it would make you rich

Open source is always one step ahead. But they don't have the resources and brand hype so people assume oai is cutting edge still

I don't quite understand why o3 for coding? Do you mean for code architecture or something? Like creating apps? Why not use a better model if its for coding?

Because it's not guessing, it's fully presenting it as fact, and for other good reasons it's actually a very good term for the issue inherent to all regression networks

They search for the wow moment to continue striking while the iron is hot, but are stuck. Failing to realise that it's when companies search for filler features and do shit like "it can talk like a human now and you can customise it" and pander it as a step forward that consumers instinctively distrust the company. If there is no new progress due to data incompleteness or incompetence or whatever, they should be ware to not further monotenize this scientific breakthrough and forever ruin the new programming language that we have discovered.

You fundamentally don't understand the hallucination problem and when it arises