KeenFlame

I understood perfectly, your claim is that it takes advertisement. Not time. And nobody has said it doesn't take time.

Okay are you ready?

The model:

• We program it
• For literally fun
• Together many people, that find different parts of bringing the web to people safely
• We do it completely altruistic

Noooo... Anyone but the best technical minds... They don't have anything better to do?

You or anybody, even huge masses of people, have zero impact on the stick, zero point several hundreds of zeroes of impact. Even if all magahats invested at the exact same time. The institutions, mainly brokers, have full control of bundling all investments and settling outside of the market. What the stick does is what very wealthy hedgies decide it should.

My take: We can have an open source browser. No resources are required. We don't need ads to view content we make. There is no need for a megacorp or any entity taking money and controlling us.

Is that a perfect trap to catch nazis? Just wave vaguely the idea of eugenics in front of them and see if they latch on?

Nobody would sue over a dirty context

I have understanding and this is horrible, extreme malpractice and not an inherent feature

Taking amphetamines improves this ability and can fix your issue. But the reason, is because you don't enjoy this as much as writing code. You enjoying what you do gives you executive power and control over what you focus on, and getting more money is not something that allows you to overcome this, if it's not stimulating, it's not as easy for you to do it. This comment is sponsored by by amphetamine.

Jk but I took the route of doing what I love and damn the money. I have to use what dopamine reserves and energy I have on other things in life, household and stuff, and if both drain me I am not as capable as if I adjust my priorities. And I have kids so it's not hard to choose really. I still count this as a blessing, since when I do stuff I love and they don't bore me, I can enjoy hyper focus and productivity, and then have energy for life too

Well, I googled exactly that and as I knew, it doesn't say what you propose. Can you explain what the fuck you mean? Free will has no evidence nor does no free will. It's a philosophical question and science can only confirm that we make choices. Your hostile arguments are so hard to interpret. What do you mean. No, there is not more evidence that we do. What evidence? Why is it so easy to find and basic to you that you become angry, yet it turns out you made it up? Can you elaborate?

It's OK not to be mature, you don't have to be mad. Your argument is that you don't have to provide proof that free will has been solved because it is easy to Google it.

Hahaha yeah the philosophy of free will is solved and you can just Google it

That's not a mature argument