MotoAsh

lol so you defend that which you do not even use and that which you do not undertand? What a joke...

My hatred is anything but blind, and you calling it such is sealioning beyond belief. I love your hypocrisy... An Apple user without even using Apple products... Truly, your lot in life is more dreary than you could ever admit.

Agile SHOULD have a lot of the things 'traditional' management looks for! Though so many, including many college teachers I've heard, think of it way too strictly.

It's just the time scale shrinks as necessary for specific deliverable goals instead of the whole product... instead of having a design for the whole thing from top to bottom, you start with a good overview and implement general arch to service what load you'll need. Then you break down the tasks, and solve the problems more and more and yadda yadda...

IMO, the people that think Agile Development means only implement the bare minimum ... are part of the complete fucking idiot portion of the industry.

Fuck man, why don't more ethical-ish devs join to make stuff? What's the missing link on top of easy sharing like FOSS kinda' already has?

Obviously programming is a bit niche, but fuck... how can ethical programmers come together to survive under capitalism? Sure, profit sharing and coops aren't bad, but something of a cultural nexus is missing in this space it feels...

Really proving how intelligent Apple fans are with that reading comprehension... The argument referenced there is obviously referencing the arguments you brought up elsewhere on the internet between Apple fans and other fans.

It's not out of nowhere. This is a topic about how people maybe should not give Apple money if they don't want to support a corporation that will bow to fascists.

How stupid and captured their dumbass fans are is DIRECTLY related to how easy it'd be to convince them to not keep throwing money at Apple.

The fact you cannot even follow a basic conversation is the only pathetic thing here.

You're right, they shouldn't be stressing either resource. Though my point was that referencing how much RAM is in the system is a bit silly when referring to a CPU being pinned at 100%. There is a HUGE swathe of CPUs with an even bigger range of performance that are all sold in 32GB systems.

I'm positive the low end of that scale could be rightfully pinned at 100% for certain common tasks.

Exactly. I don't know why I'm being downvoted for describing the thing we all agree happens...

I don't blame the students for not being seasoned professionals. I clearly blame the executives that constantly replace seasoned engineers with fresh hires they don't have to pay as much.

Then everyone surprise pikachu faces when crap is the result... Functionally idiots is absolutely correct for the reality we're all staring at. I am directly part of this industry, so this is more meant as honest retrospective than baseless namecalling. What happens these days is idiotry.

Probably because all the dummies are finally realizing it's a fucking stupid slogan that's constantly being misinterpreted from what it's supposed to mean. lol (as if the dummies even realize it has a more logical interpretation...)

Now if only they would complete the maturation process and realize all of the tech bro bullshit runs counter to good engineering or business...

Microsoft might prove that one wrong if they keep enshittifying Windows.

lol you're just plain wrong on that. Apple fans these days are like you: They make fun of everyone outside of their group instead of the products themselves, because you all understand you won't ever be winning an objective argument.

No. No it doesn't, ALL human-like behavior stems from its training data ... that comes from humans.

Well, it's also stupid to use RAM size as an indicator of a machines CPU load capability...

Definitely sending off some tech illiterate vibes.