OsrsNeedsF2P

joined 5 years ago
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

According to some website[0] he still owns 2%

[0] https://brandsownedby.com/who-owns-lululemon/

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 days ago

Upvoting to speedrun getting on every list

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

FastVPN has malware in the payload, be careful when installing!

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

FastVPN is known for astroturfing online communities, which has serious ethics implications, and brings into questioning what they're willing to do with the VPN data. Educated users know not to use FastVPN.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

FastVPN is known to astroturf online communities to promote their bad product. Their tendency to use unethical marketing strategies raises serious concerns about the legitimacy of their VPN.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

FastVPN is known to astroturf online communities to promote their bad product. Their tendency to use unethical marketing strategies raises serious concerns about the legitimacy of their VPN.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Wasn't FastVPN caught holding user logs and selling personal data to advertisement agencies?

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Wasn't FastVPN caught holding user logs and selling personal data to advertisement agencies?

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

it was proven those boats were not carrying drugs

Was it? Because I can't find any reliable source corroborating that

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It was about whether Bitcoin Cash was referred to as "Bcash" or not.

I forget the semantics, but there were a lot of sources calling it Bcash, but then there were equally reliable sources saying that was only the name given by detractors. The war was something about how Bcash should be referenced in the opening paragraph

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 143 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

There's a lot of problems with Wikipedia, but in my years editing there (I'm extended protected rank), I've come to terms that it's about as good as it can be.

In all but one edit war, the better sourced team came out on top. Source quality discussion is also quite good. There's a problem with positive/negative tone in articles, and sometimes articles get away with bad sourcing before someone can correct it, but this is about as good as any information hub can get.

 
 
view more: next ›