Prunebutt

joined 2 years ago
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 month ago (55 children)

Project Cybersyn was a real, socialist, working system, comrade and it was based on the same principles as brain of the firm.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 month ago (24 children)

So the "first" definition is the only one or what? What's it with you and your refusal to accept that there are more than one way to interpret things, sometimes?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -5 points 1 month ago (27 children)

The "Sugar" part still refers to the connotations of sexual favors,

That's your interpretation. It can also refer to a power dynamic or state of affection from the giver to the receiver.

That's like claiming the term implies pedophilia, or domnestic abuse, because of the "daddy" part.

You're the one who made it sexual.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

🤓

Don't "umm, akshually" me to death, please. /s

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (32 children)

(Yes, I know Marx was older than Engels - it was a joke, ffs)

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 month ago
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -3 points 1 month ago (34 children)

Dunno why you have to phrase it in a sexual manner

Interpreting "sugar daddy" in a sexual manner says more about you than the usage of the word does about me. (As does remarking on it at all: I don't care whether or not Marx and Engels were in a sexual relationship... do you?)

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I do understand the definitions, again

Again: I disagree with your assumption that you do. If you really do, then you refuse to engage with them on purpose, which is worse.

I don't see any pointein carrying on this conversation. I've stated my point. I expect you to write your final "nuh-uh!" without any signs of will that you actually want to engage in any discussion, but I will not further engage, because I see talking to you pointless.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -3 points 1 month ago (36 children)

I'm sure Marx' sugar daddy was very important for him.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

No, I have heard and understand your explanations

You've clearly not understood the definitions. If you don't engage with the definitions, you can't seriously engage with the arguments.

I used to be an anarchist myself

Obviously, not one with a clear grasp on anarchism, if you think that the only anarchist objection to hierarchy is "moral" in nature.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

No, you refuse to understand what anarchists understand as authority (just like Engels did).

It's been explained enough to you already that I can rule out anything but refusal to understand.

view more: ‹ prev next ›