Look, I'm not particular about rice, but if I see long rice on the risotto, what I'll do isn't even covered in the Geneva conventions.
Railcar8095
joined 2 years ago
Your reasoning is a random one, with the exact same validity and any other random one. "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence" rings any bell?
Everybody hates Russia and would be eager to fight if Russia didn't have nuclear bombs. Remove the critical voices and we are ready to go.
Wait, you claim "everybody" hates Russia but doesn't fight because Russia has nuclear bombs, so they are removing critical voices to be able to attack... Are nuclear weapons powered by critical voices? Or are you hallucinating?
I haven't said anything about those laws making sense or not, I've only implied your reasoning doesn't make sense.
My theory? To fight Nintendo switch 2 scalpers. It makes more sense than your theory if you could think about it.
Flightless, but fightfull
Physical distance of his testicles and some pliers might be the deciding factor between giving all the data and ALL the data.
"Chinese government killed their own people, it's fine! They are basically property"
I say, why not both?
I guess the Chinese soldiers were minding their own business at home with their families, and not there to just put down protests against authoritarianism.
Can you share that link? I'm curious how the 7 "non directly caused by protesters" died. They just had a random accident? Lovers quarrel? Food poisoning?
We had 100+ classifying text by hand for a customer on India. The costumer thought it was Deep Learning back then.
Kudos on your mental fortitude. The level is stupidity that guy is showing nearly broke me.