If we don't save this way our public services, we allow a future intervention by the EU, and seeing what they did in Greece last time. We're better off doing things slowly without people loosing their jobs rather than the IMF and Bruxelles cutting through our social contract.
Renohren
joined 2 years ago
Ask any Frenchmen, there are quite a lot agencies who procure exactly the same services. You do not need to fire people, tear down public services, just bring 2 or 3 of those agencies under the same roof. It will also make things simpler for citizens.
So, 3% reduction of the public deficit over 5 years expected. I don't think it is similar to what is done in the US at all.
Title gore to mobilise ( not accusing the author, the source rather) ? Or is that just merging pyramids into bigger ones without firing people or abandoning missions? Feels like the second seeing the expected reduction in public deficit.
All this is true, bit Vance is the vice president, if Trump goes, we're stuck with him for the remainder of Trumps term.
And leave us with Vance? It's the same incompetence.
It has never been meant to be a peacekeeping force but a dissuasive force. It is meant to be on Ukraine's side from day one, not one to be in the middle. And that's a good thing in my book. There clearly is a victim and a criminal here.
It still will be dissuasive because western soldiers and western air forces will still be used on the ground and in the skies of Ukraine. This was the French vision ( having the troops sent there be used not on watchtower duty but to make the ukrainians into the future EU armed forces by integrating western millitary standards into the ukrainian armed forces ) It's good the UK sides with that vision.
If they wanted peacekeeping, the Russian proposition of putting UN troops as a peacekeeping force would have done the job.
Maybe because logistics is such a complicated mess grok can't process it?
The only thing is negociation time. It takes a very long time to strike such accords and the political time in the US is very short.
Everything could be reversed tomorrow or in 2 years or never or be rereversed in 4...
Trade deals among stable countries usually account for longer lifespans to assure the market they can deploy and still benefit from it in 20 years.
It takes an especially long time with the EU as you need all 27 countries to accept it through each parliament and sometimes referendums and account for incoming countries. Any "no" is a veto of the whole accord. And you have to start all the negotiation from scratch.
It reminds me a lot of the first things that A. Hitler did in Germany after being elected. Putting the problem away.
But just like the Nazis of old, this government is going to start thinking about a way to keep putting the problem away at a lesser cost, especially once ICE get too many deportees to keep flying them out without humongous logistics.
They are going to hit the same hurdles, and (hopefully not) deal with them in the same way.
To be recognised as ukrainian. What else?
The chinese are falling into Trump's trap and are actively helping him make his promise true: gas is cheap.
What a 5D chess player!
/S on all that, OfC !
I live very close to the border but on the French side, we had a tiny outage of about 1/3 of a second (but long enough to reset routers)... That's probably why.