SecretiveSailor

According to that logic, if you sell anything second hand, you should give a cut of that to the original manufacturer of the product? Plus what you're saying applies to all art. According to this logic, there should be no contracts and one-off jobs if it involves art. Every freelance graphic designer who designed a logo for a company has to now permanently get a stream of profits for every company they made a logo for.

Dude its everything. Gmail, Yahoo, AOL.....every single email provider needs a cell phone

Architecture is art too. Its not just for functional means. Even the paint strokes on a wall can be considered art (how meticulously its done) and something as simple as paint texture can make people continue choosing that hotel.

Its now also IMPOSSIBLE to create an email account without a cell phone. Imagine that. You can't send email if you don't have a cellphone

My guess is its for people who really love their job. Like - Creature designer at ILM or something like that.

Well I'm not talking about creating an invention. I'm talking about building a product for someone else. If an architect creates a hotel for someone (no matter how insane or swaggy its design), they don't usually get the profits afterwards. They are paid for that construction job alone. That's more like what happened with this movie.

So if you build a hotel and generate profit, should you funnel that profit to the people who constructed the hotel?

Why does every job have to be a lifelong commitment? According to you, they should get rid of all contract jobs and nothing should be a one-off deal?

First game I thought of was Rayman. But its more of a full circle thing.

Hmm lets see - The work was 20 days of "art directing" (i.e. telling other artists what to do). How much do you think that's worth?

That "rig" is called a contract lol

Yeah according to her logic, if the film did really badly, she now has to pay back her wages. lmao