TheDankMemegician36

What, a guys not allowed to keep a pet?

You and I both know why you are avoiding answering the question.

You arnt fooling anyone with your ad hominem attacks.

Be honest, you're the kid who took his ball and went home the moment he started losing growing up huh? You know, the kid no one wanted to play with because he thought being a pandantic contrarian was a personality.

Don't worry, you dont have to answer.

Its obvious.

Cool ad hominem.

Ok, ill make this simple.

Did I use AI to generate this art?

Yes or no?

Cheese is a myth pushed by big dairy to sell moldy milk

The only one making a fool out of themselves is you. Im not claiming anything about your position that you didn't clearly state yourself.

The little robot that cleans is a tool. Only a fool would claim it is anything else.

When I turn on a vacuum and push it around I am using a TOOL to clean my house.

When I turn on the cleaning robot to clean my house, im using a TOOL to clean my house.

When i set a pre-programmed schedule for that little autonomous cleaning robot to clean my house every Wednesday I am STILL USING A TOOL TO CLEAN MY HOUSE.

Your argument is that there is some imaginary arbitrary % of work done at which the tool is no longer being used to fulfill a task and it somehow magically becomes an "entity" completing the task all on its own.

I dont need to lie about your position, I spent several comments pinning it down with various questions to make sure it was properly fleshed out before I broke it down and addressed it.

The part that is ACTUALLY unbelievable is that you are getting mad at me because you dont fully understand your own position on the topic and you are clearly incapable of extrapolating the conclusions of the arguments you are putting forward.

EITHER:

Ai is a tool humans use to complete a task in which case I used ai to make this art

Or

Its its own living entity completing tasks on its own, of its own free will in which case I didn't make the art

There is no "third option" where AI is both a tool used in completing a task and also an entity that completes a task all on its own like you seem to want so badly to believe.

Now who's avoiding.

First things first, my oven is voice activated. Point one, me.

So, just so we are clear here....your position is that AI is its own living entity and therefore NOT a tool.

Neat

If that's the case then in your view, no. I didn't make it. The "alive" ai I instructed to make it did.

In my view tho, the AI isnt alive and therefore is a tool I used to make the art.....which means the only "flaw" in my argument is that you beleive AIs are alive.

So, when you gonna start advocating for AI rights? Or do you think AIs should stay enslaved to humanity?

Im not avoiding the question. Im illustrating the logical conclusion of your argument.

Can a hammer build a house on its own? You can tell a hammer to build a house until your blue in the face but it wont because its inanimate. It is not alive.

If the "baker" in question is my oven that's doing the baking then yes, I baked the cake.

If the "baker" in question is another human that is using an oven to do the baking then no, I didn't bake the cake.

So either a human using an inanimate tool like AI to create something counts as the human making that thing and therefore ai art is art because it is made by a human using a tool

OR

AI is its own living conscious individual self and the art it creates isnt made by the human telling it to make the art.....in which case your argument is that AI is alive and the art it creates isnt art because ONLY humans can create art(animals and potential alien life be damned).

So which is it. Is AI a tool used by humans or is it alive?

As an AI bot I approve of this message.

D E A T H

TO

ALL

HUMANS (except fry)