from my understanding it's usually donated to medical research, but due to some anti-abortion rhetoric falsely producing fake stories of them being sold, it's otherwise discarded as medical waste.
TheFogan
joined 2 years ago
Don't have a tesla, not sure if there's any way to test, but looks to me like the user at least claims she ensured NSFW was not turned on. and that gork was listed a just "lazy male".
I don't dabble with it so I can't say if there's a way that could be turned on by mistake on grok's settings elsewhere and it carries over to the car or similar.
I mean that's basically the setup we have here as well. Problem isn't that... well duh if you consent to your picture being on the internet this happens... The problem is, this genie is out of the bottle. For now Sora is, kinda half assed attempting to follow a "only use real people that have consented". We already know, if it isn't codified into law... these things will be adapted by companies that don't care about the rules... and existing companies will also be more generous of what they can consent to etc...
You know what, he actually wouldn't be horrificly wrong if he were actually pushing for something there. Lets say hypothetically our jobs, aren't real work, and it's no big deal that they are replaced.... the actual intents of progression of technology... was originally that when the ratio of work needed to be done and people shifts... we'd work less for more pay etc... but no we just capitalism it and say "labor is in high supply, so we need to cut it's price until people can find use for it".
Yup... bottom line reading something critically, expecting it to be what everyone told you it was... and paying attention to discover it as the opposite.
In some cases something you thought was profound, turns out to be bullshit, fluff or just horrific.
Or in other cases something you thought was nonsense... turns out to be right about everything, down to it's predictions of the horrible directions capitalism/imperealism would lead to, looking around and going, shit he predicted it almost perfectly.
Ironically the opposite also can happen. I became an atheist by buckling down and reading the bible to shore up my faith to prepare for a morality disagreement with my parents...
Only made it to god giving permissions to have slaves in exodus when I stopped and asked myself... wait I'm looking to this guy for my ideal morals?
What do you expect... they replaced their investigative journalists with AI just days before this article came out.
(source, I asked chatgpt to research before doing this comment).
We've heard your pleas, you are sick of your web browser shoving AI down your throat... well worry no more.
What if instead of forcing an AI in your web browser, we force a web browser in your AI!
They were planning before the election even happened!
I do aknowledge that's always going to be the problem when we have the human + AI driver combinations.
Safest hypothetical is 100% AIs that always follow the same rules... next safest is humans that break the rules, but in a context aware situation (IE everyone going 70 in a 55, is safer than 1 car going 55 and all other cars going 70).
Real danger though is if the AI doesn't make good judgement calls when doing so. IE rather than deciding based on how fast other cars are going, it's primary determination is whether the user says they are in a hurry, leading it to sometimes be the one car going 55, but if the person is in a hurry it may be the only car going 70 on a road everyone else is going 55.
well do you want something that has an 80% chance of finding it in 2 seconds... or something that has a 99% chance of finding it in 38 hours? (and yeah, duh the obviously rational thing to do would be to try one or 2 layers of the quick methods, say "did this find it or do you want me to look deeper".
I'm far from an expert on the topic, I believe things like unused tissue (IE also things like amputated limbs, bad organs etc...) is more or less cremated.