Oh, it wasn't the UN that was the intended recipient of that particular message. That's why it was sent publicly...
Tobberone
joined 1 week ago
Oh, it wasn't the UN that was the intended recipient of that particular message. That's why it was sent publicly...
Absolutely! You are quite right. However, my interpretation of this message is not necessarily "we might reconsider our stance on troop mines". Rather it is: "we will go to any lengths, even those we find barbaric and cruel, to defend our nation". Although on the face of it, it is the wording of the agreement that sets the formalities.