Trainwreck_Reversed

No not "the end" just "end"

That's not what I said what xd

I guess I was assuming how this project was made, as some people have pointed out about its "clean-room" method, but checking the GitHub, the main contributor is Claude's llm, which grabs everything and anything.

I should probably think about how I feel about locally run llms, because its not massive polluting and disturbing data centers, but again, the models themselves are trained on something, and even though you can't get "good" models without a lot of training data, it would still be unethical, atleast in these cases. Slightly off topic at the end but I guess that's just my main concern here.

I can also understand the view point of llms being "using the capitalist's tools against them", and in some ways you're right, but I still think we should be aware of what were using and what were doing instead of just praising it in the name of fighting back.

I myself will still not like generative AI, simply because of all the shit and more, but also how damaging it has been for the creative space

Yeah, go against adobe, I support you, but stay with the people. Dont use the big tech's stealing machine. Dont incentivize big tech's current fascist push of a product. AI is bad in so many ways, environmentally, ethically; taking away real people's work, stealing other people's work.

If you want to use this AI generated alternative of adobe because adobe is horrible, then I understand you, and that's fine, if you remember that this isn't perfect either.

This is a lesser evil, and we should seek out alternatives still. Hope there's someone who isn't discouraged by this project as its now been praised by literally everyone

If you're advocating on the behalf of the vibe coded adobe alternatives, you're essentially saying "I support stealing from everyone". Yes, I hate adobe, I say eat the rich, but dont exploit the poor in the meantime

I'm not saying adobe is good, I'm saying this adobe alternative is also bad. Like I guess photocraft and its suite is a lesser evil, but you can't say this project is by and for the people when its, again, built by stolen works

I don't want to incentivize using tools made through stealing other's work then claiming it's for the people