UniversalBasicJustice

joined 1 week ago

I'm not so sure it is. If the leading surface was completely bluff, the length of roof were shorter than the protruding boat and it was moving very fast then yeah, maybe.

In reality, the nose of the RV plus the length of roof surface along with non-Mach speeds will virtually guarantee the bulk of the airflow will remain coupled to that roof until a radical change in geometry such as the boat.

[–] UniversalBasicJustice@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago (3 children)

You're going to make me learn OpenFOAM aren't you

[–] UniversalBasicJustice@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Okay but there's no way the flow separates from that roof enough to clear the boat

Signal has a Note to Self. Bonus; encrypted.

[–] UniversalBasicJustice@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Would Grainger or McMaster Carr fill in the 3M/tool gap?

view more: ‹ prev next ›