Yes. They can pay to build their own sources of power of their own choosing. Or put more resources into doing data centers more efficiently, their choice.
Usernameblankface
joined 2 years ago
Even the advertisers?
When the job requirements are so unsustainable and the safety is so sketchy that they plan for a high turnover rate, robots are the better option.
Yes, people have paid their bills because of these jobs. But I have a hard time believing that the money makes it worth the damage to their health that will follow the worker through their career. There are many other jobs like this that are better left to a machine or else lower the expectations per worker to improve working conditions
If I want to watch something, I'm going to sit down and only watch the thing.
Less the length, more the subject, source, and why are they sending it to me.
A video that explains a concept my friend has been trying to tell me about, or it's about a shared interest, I'll find the time to go through it.
A video that "seems neat, what a concept" better be shorter than 2 minutes.
A video from a news source "thought you should see this" not watching it and no response from me on that.
This is great news!
If it looks like the example photos, it's a more elegant solution. I'm not fully sold on the paper rolls vs the standard reams of paper, but being able to package the printer like that looks amazing
That's a good point
They're not synonyms, but they are close enough that when said quickly they can be homonyms
Huh. When I first got to Lemmy, I looked around for the no dumb questions community, look like it has grown a lot since then!
Repeating what many have said, those rules are written in blood.
Yeah, that word choice can unfortunately work perfectly in 2 ways. I meant white underwear in the briefs style
view more: next ›
An antique mechanical typewriter is the best thing I've found for writing. Useless for coding, so there's the product above for that