Wasn’t the big complaint against Star Trek: Section 31 was that people didn’t want to watch Corrupt Space CIA?
I think the much bigger complaints are that it was boring, derivative, and had nothing to say?
Wasn’t the big complaint against Star Trek: Section 31 was that people didn’t want to watch Corrupt Space CIA?
I think the much bigger complaints are that it was boring, derivative, and had nothing to say?
The good news is, the word "glorify" does not appear in this article.
Yeah, I mean it's barely a description at all - we're surviving on scraps over here.
playing the hits
"...while this [script] isn’t a cynical or nihilistic take on it, I think it does acknowledge that there are some bad apples in every institution that can have a strong voice and can really make an impact on that institution and everything it stands for.”
How could they possibly think this is relevant subject matter in the year 2026?
Oh jeepers, I hadn't considered the Yelchin angle.
My thoughts on this are lengthy, complicated, and probably a little bit self-contradictory, but I think some of the accusations of "gimmicks" are a tad overblown. But also a tad not overblown?
"Valles Marineris" - A pretty standard Trek episode IMO, albeit one with time travel and a twist.
"The Griffin Incident" - A horror episode, but not really a gimmicky one. Star Trek does those all the time.
"Human Best Friend" - Definitely pulling from a specific comedy genre, YMMV.
"A Case of Chiaroscuro" - I won't argue with accusations of "gimmick" here, but I thought its use of the genre was in service of a pretty damn good Star Trek story. And DS9 in particular went to the noir well a few times over the years.
"Level Five Transporter Accident" - perfectly normal, nothing to see here.
"Off-Hour" - Pretty standard Trek.
But they definitely do a lot of genre play, and recent interviews with the showrunners indicate that it's completely intentional, and unlikely to change any time soon.
I've been reconciling it by focusing on each episode as its own thing, independent of the others, and hot damn, it's surprising how hard that's become for me.
This one looks like a Quelane episode, so I think it's pretty fitting.
I just took it that they both silently agreed that Una was the logical choice and didn’t need to litigate it.
I just took it for granted that she's the ranking officer, and it's her call to make. The fact that it led to a (potentially) unfortunate situation later isn't really relevant in the moment, since they can't predict that.
It's interesting that they're doing so much in London. Good for them!
I assumed they used neutrinos because they're closely associated with the Bajoran wormhole (and I think wormholes in general?).
I don't mind there being some sort of Super Secret Special neutrino that only exists under circumstances that can't really be replicated, but it is a very silly particle.
I haven't actually seen "Training Day," but I suppose both films have entrenched authority figures with outdated and/or corrupt ideas of How Things Are Done, and younger subordinates who have to walk through the ethical minefield that's been laid.
And I agree, that could be good Trek.