Aight I'll put it on for an hour on YouTube vanced
Edit:
This guy is of far higher quality.
The video you showed me, god damn.. the rambling goes on and on. Do not pay for his lectures, he's just stretching the hour and giving you no content. Just money money money
This guy (even though you might hate him for being Israeli) is brilliant though. World renowned.
Not gonna lie, this is kinda how I'm watching the subsidies on chinese EV.
Now, would I want to pay taxes to export European cars to the rest of the world? Hell no.
So I'm quite confused
Forcing Chinese capitalists to invest in poorer countries, is pretty brilliant.
This is a win for the world and a loss for the Chinese government.
π¬ not to be smug, but in Belgium and in most of the world it's 300 euros
I don't really understand the need to bring industry in your own country, if another country does it cheaper.
The only reason I can think of is independence. Limiting others their power over you.
But purely economically? It's a waste of resources.
Who will do these jobs anyways? For what income? What can they learn at these jobs? Why would they waste their own opportunity of living in a wealthy economy just to do a job that someone without education and far lower costs can do?
These jobs are temporarily, the next generation won't do those. Then the factories move again to another poor country.
Which is a good thing. This is how we develop the whole world.
When the whole world is developed, there will be no need for such braindead jobs.
If you need tariffs to get those jobs at your location, you're just being inefficient.
But that's economically. Can't trust other countries until we're all more united. And the current era is not making that look promising.
I imagine a lot of Americans give birth at home to reduce costs.
Perhaps I'm just cheap
They are socially leftist but economically not.
Stocks did quite well under Biden, so I don't see an issue. Bottom 50% of the population gained a larger percentage of total wealth.
Why would you even want a manufacturing job? We're paying people without education to do that. We're paying their living costs, which is far cheaper. Then import it cheaply.
I'm only interested in the difficult jobs. Engineers never had an issue getting a job.
My mate applying for an Amazon job for minimum wage, like what. He's wasting all his opportunity. I never worked for a minimum wage job, never will.
Anyways, I made good profit on trump's market crash. Today's a good day
Bought lu908500753 at 221 each for 84 pieces.
Let's see what happens today
The monarchy is basically a cheerleader group, they are symbolic. The leader of the country is the prime minister, currently Bart De Wever.
For the EU it doesn't matter that trump puts 20% tariffs, as long as china has higher tariffs. China sells to us, we manufacture it further, we sell it to the USA.
It doesn't even matter that much, you folks barely have any VAT on your products. These tariffs will be a discriminatory VAT.
It's going to hurt a lot in the short term. This is a policy that requires a steady leadership like china has. I don't believe the USA has the structure for that. In the next elections it will be a landslide victory for the democrats. Too much chaos and uncertainty, looks like child's play to win such an election.
Le chat:
"Men are statistically more likely to be violent than women, according to various studies and data. This tendency is reflected in higher rates of violent crimes, such as intimate partner violence, murder, assault, and rape, where men are the predominant perpetrators. Several factors contribute to this disparity:
Biological Factors: Evolutionary perspectives suggest that male aggression has been shaped by sexual selection, where men compete more intensely for access to mates. This competition has led to physical characteristics such as larger size and strength, which are associated with greater physical aggressiveness.
Social and Cultural Factors: Social conditioning and societal expectations play a significant role. Men are often encouraged to be aggressive and dominant, while women are typically socialized to be more submissive and passive.
Neurological Differences: Studies using fMRI and EEG have shown differences in brain activity related to aggression. Men tend to have higher amygdala activation during provocation, which is associated with impulsive aggression.
Behavioral Differences: From a young age, boys and girls exhibit different levels of physical aggression. While both genders peak in physical aggressiveness between two and four years old, girls learn to suppress these behaviors more quickly than boys.
Types of Aggression: Men tend to express physical, overt, and direct aggression more frequently, whereas women are more likely to engage in relational and indirect forms of aggression.
These factors combined contribute to the overall higher levels of violence observed in men compared to women."
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4643362/
https://science.howstuffworks.com/life/inside-the-mind/emotions/men-more-violent.htm
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281200287X
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/behavioral-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00081/full