XLE

I was going to say, especially in this era, "lawful" does not necessarily mean "good," and can often be far from it.

Well this is quite the rabbit hole.

https://web.archive.org/web/20200219183352/http://initsimage.org/

This is incorrect.

Anthropic contradicts this, showing an aggressive willingness to work with the Trump department of "War."

Even fully autonomous weapons (those that take humans out of the loop entirely and automate selecting and engaging targets) may prove critical for our national defense... We have offered to work directly with the Department of War on R&D to improve the reliability of these systems

Serinus, did you see the part where Anthropic wants to develop them with the US military?

No. They aren't the "good guy," and they don't need to be lauded as such.

Anthropic has been willing to throw away so many reasonable constraints, and they always have. The companies are disturbingly similar, and Anthropic is worse in some ways.

Is there any literature that actually says DABUS exists? Everything I see online is talking about the spectacle of Stephen Thaler claiming it made something - and trying to patent it in several different countries across multiple continents - not how (or if) DABUS exists or functions.

DABUS stands for "Device for the Autonomous Bootstrapping of Unified Sentience," which sounds... suspicious.

Iconoclast, I asked you a question and was hoping for an answer.

You're aware of the sexual abuse and death Eli Yudkowski is either directly or indirectly responsible for, right?

You said Anthropic didn't want to develop autonomous weapons. Anthropic contradicts you. They do want to develop them.

Can you acknowledge this fact?

I love how Anthropic only draws the line at autonomously killing Americans, too. I guess some lives are worth more than others.

When mainstream media and various celebrities have cast Anthropic as the "good guy", it's important to point out.