alphabethunter

joined 1 year ago
[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Oh, you're for real an Israel apologist. I for a second thought you might just be naive, but no, it's much worse. You're a genocide supporter.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

My cat literally loves hiding behind my display port connected monitor, bumps into it all the time, it has never disconnected or stopped working. Your cable might suck.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Nah, you have interpretation problems and a little cursing on the internet is quite inoffensive.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I hate this shit as well. People use "The Earth" to make it sound good for the environment, but it's actually just human greed we're always talking about. Take sustainability for example, you ask teens about it, and a lot of them will say it's about saving the environment. It's not. It's about trying to sustain capitalism and our consumerist lifestyle to go on forever while pretending to give a fuck about the environment.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Trying to find logic in religion often results in that.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The apps already use your phone number, on pc you connect to your phone app. But it used to be possible to change your account phone number, and that's what they seem to have blocked.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

It's not a problem, it's a business opportunity. The more they break, the more they can sell you a 2000 dollars phone.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's clearly the doctor.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

China is a brand new type of socialism, one that Marx couldn't ever hope to write about, as that would have needed him to go through many important moments of world history (great wars, nuclear development, age of information...) that he could never have predicted. China in the 50s was an agrarian/third world nation, after the CCP took over their plan was simple: "Muster the strength of the entire population to push China into a new age through carefully planned country-wise economic strategies". It's a different perspective when compared to western capitalist societies that value individual freedom above the well-being of the nation, their idea was to value the nation above everything and everyone. To sacrifice generations in favor of economic development, to turn weakness, a poor country with more people than it could feed, into strength, a country where labor was so cheap it became the perfect trap to steal the advantages the first-world had developed: industries. Now, the western world has lost all of its advantages, they no longer have manufacturing capabilities that are enough even to supply their own demand, and its final advantage, technological supremacy slowly slips away from their hands. All that they have left is a class of uber-billionaires more than willing to sacrifice entire nations just so they can buy another yacht. Meanwhile, western media points their finger and exclaims: "Inhuman! The Chinese are using their own people to steal our western jobs with cheap labor!!!", and Liberals left and right look down from their "moral superiority" seat of ignorance and agree, calling the chinese the evil masterminds of the century for daring to not (EDIT: word order) have their same views that valuing individual freedom as a divine natural right, as said Locke, is the only correct moral path, and anything else is Evil wrought upon this world. Thus, they fail to see that, although indeed Machiavellian-looking, valuing the community, the society, above the individual is exactly where the true left had always resided. What good is personal freedom when a man can buy another? And do not mistake me, I do not claim their methods to be flawlessly, they are indeed ruthless, but the Chinese Government can most certainly be conferred the title of "efficient", in a few decades they took a country from the throngs of poverty and the past and pushed it forward, with sacrifices indeed, to the forefront of modern development. Are they truly wrong? Would you prefer they'd stuck to being slaves of first-world countries? As someone who does live in a third world, developing country, as they say, I'd be very very glad to see the same mentality of my own government, I'd sacrifice myself gladly to hope for a better future for the next generations. Instead, all I get is the proverbial choice of working my whole life to not starve to death while making a garbage human billionaire hiding in a mansion somewhere richer and richer at the cost of the people, all while my country not only barely inches forward in quality of life, but is constantly shoved back down the mud by the actions of western interests, that easily stoop to all the tricks of the CIA handbook just to keep us too busy too see that the evil wears not red, but blue and stars.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

My win 11 pc (decently modern Ryzen 5600G) used to boot in 10~20 seconds, and then suddenly was taking 10+ minutes to boot. The problem? An external hdd. Removed that and instantly went back to 10~20 seconds boot. The people above 100% are having some sort of issue and just don't know.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most people don't understand art, as most people also don't understand chess. It's important to accept that art is not something you can understand just because you like it or not, that's not the same thing; in the same way that's important to accept that a move made by a grandmaster chess player cannot be judged by someone who doesn't understand chess at a deep enough level. Science follows a similar conundrum, people don't understand even the most fundamental level of a certain field beyond their high-school knowledge and they still believe themselves capable of judging what science is.

We, as humans, and as a society, must learn to accept our own shortcomings and take pride in not having an opinion about something that we do not understand enough. It's fine to listen and like some tunes, but that does not give you the qualifications and knowledge to judge the quality of music and art. For that, you'd have to go deeper, and then you would also become a "snob".

view more: next ›