catloaf

joined 2 years ago
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You can make that assumption at your own peril.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 22 points 8 months ago (5 children)

No, that would not be legal. I don't know how they write the law exactly, but they account for that. Could be based on country of manufacture.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

It's the NY Post, it's a trash tabloid to start with, so yeah its demographic is going to be correspondingly worse.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah it's probably including stuff that never makes it to the consumer. Like in the US, every year, they print "super bowl champion" shirts, hats, etc. for both teams, so that they can sell them immediately after the game. The other half go right to recycling or shipped to developing countries. Same with misprints or stuff that doesn't pass QC. You spend time in developing countries, and you'll notice people wearing "Kansas City Super Bowl Champions 2025" (they lost that game) or random shirts with misaligned or reversed graphics.

Which is also harmful to their community because it undercuts local production.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

It's been going on for years now, and well reported during that time. What's new about this?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Civil disobedience involves the acceptance of consequences.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Right. If it's signed by a CA, it's not self signed. Self signed means signed by nobody but the server that generated it.

self-signed certificates are public key certificates that are not issued by a certificate authority (CA)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-signed_certificate

An internal CA whose signing certs you've manually installed is still a trusted CA.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

If it's signed by an intermediate CA, then it's not self-signed.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (6 children)

It sounds like the clients do not have the ability to manually trust a self-signed cert.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, you shouldn't, but OP seems determined to hamstring themselves and do everything as convoluted as possible.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

Already answered in your previous post: https://lemm.ee/post/60855169/19569046

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago (15 children)

ProtonVPN in its free tier does not allow LAN connections

This is the limiting factor. In order to get around this, you'll have to put your Jellyfin server on the Internet. Hopefully you can enable port forwarding. If not, you have painted yourself into a corner.

If you cannot use self-signed or internal CA certs, you will also need a domain name, and something like Let's Encrypt to issue certs for that domain.

view more: ‹ prev next ›