charonn0

joined 3 years ago
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 4 points 4 hours ago

There's no plausible deniability with oil down the drain. The landlord would just bill you for the damage.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This looks uncomfortable and humiliating. Now if they were to make it in the form of a suppository...

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'd rather be guilty of that than of being the ones who rejected them.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's clearly haunted.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Noo-clee-ar... wessels

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 12 points 1 week ago

Probably not criminal trespassing, since they are the owner of the property. It may fall under tenant harassment, unauthorized entry, constructive eviction, or other laws that pertain specifically to landlord/tenant relations.

Check to see if there are any local tenant's rights or advocacy groups in your area that offer free legal consultations. They'd be able to advise you on the local tenant's rights laws and whether they apply to your situation.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Just stick your hands between your buttocks. That's nature's pocket.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

Multiple HTTP requests can be performed over a single connection, and not all connections are for HTTP requests in the first place. The only way to know that an HTTP request is being made (or how many) is to actually see the requests.

 

I've been listening to X-Minus-One episodes for the last few days and am really starting to appreciate the radio play format. Some of the stories are pretty dated, being from the 40's and 50's, but a lot of them still hold up if you're a little forgiving on the science details.

view more: next ›