cuchi

joined 2 years ago
[–] cuchi@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

Depends, I have my opinions about some stuff of new trek but honestly I prefer to not saying nothing at all really. For example, Ortega sometimes have a undesireable behaviour in some episodes and is almost forced compared with other episodes. (Specially episode 9 season 3, Terrarium)

Or how sometimes, for some reason, universal translator don't translate spanish words of Ortega or Captain Rios in picard.

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago

TNG was the last thing related with terraforming. You can include Ferengi terraforming bomb in Lower Decks.

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 5 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Is plausible to go faster of warp 10, but not reaching warp 11, so is nothing wrong to me.

[–] cuchi@startrek.website -1 points 2 months ago

I think a comedy is "less canon" because calling Cerritos a "California class" is more like saying "this is the most wimp or weakling starfleet ships ever". So I believe Lower Lecks is canon, but not everything can be taked into a 100% serious story. But that's just my thought.

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So, reading a bit yesterday and reading your comment now, historically aircraft carrier enterprise was class Nimitz because, well, they like the name, so I can give an idea how can work in Star Trek. I didn't know ships have "class" and random names, I always thought it was more logically choosen.

Sumarise: Now I know ships has random names and class with all similar ships, but class is not equal of ranks or something. Like hierarchy, that's why I didn't get it.

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't get it.

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I notice california class was a joke, that's why I ask how much is canon in general.

I look that Zhenzhou and is "Walker-class" what does class means? At least Crazy horse is from the original series, so maybe was a time of brainstorming.

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago

I ask about target in another thread, I think Paramount dosen't know the Star Trek target either.

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 7 points 2 months ago

We need this artstyle again. /s

Looking it now, it reminds me of those Invincible memes people made up.

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know, DS9 is not that edgy and when there is extremist actions they are complained for not follow the starfleet tradition or being unethicals.

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So starfleet has quota law?

[–] cuchi@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago

I came later to the party, but I just watch this today.

Good concept but lacks of Gene Roddenberry's optimism.

Yes, the ending of the episode is optimistic, but I would’ve liked the Federation to feel confident and secure from the very beginning, and then, as the episode progressed, start having doubts. I understand that they want to add more nuance to the starfleet, but you know what? That’s already what Halo and Mass Effect do. (although the third Mass Effect 3 is ironically a bit more optimistic). I want them to genuinely be able to present a positive vision of the future.

view more: ‹ prev next ›