deadcatbounce

joined 2 years ago
[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 19 points 5 months ago

Because they don't need to. As Zuckerberg himself said: people will voluntarily give all kinds of private information to corporates without being asked or by the gentlest of requests.

[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 8 points 5 months ago

To be honest, learn who you are before going on an app or trying to engage for a partner.

You've been together (in perception, at least) a long time and you're still that married person and it will take time to remember who you are without that other person, regardless of whether you were a functioning couple or two people in the same house.

The loneliness is just the transition sinking in.

I'm a couple years older than you.

[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Logseq to Obsidian.

Logseq's markdown is weird and not standard. Everything is indented and in a list, even headings. I love me some open source, but this is a hard no.

Open your logseq files in a plain text editor and compare with the standard. I spend much of my time editing them back to Markdown.

Syncing logseq is easy on Syncthing. The only issue being that one has to watch out for conflicts by not editing one on one instance before the other sends it/it is received, but that's a sync issue not Logseq.

[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com -1 points 5 months ago

Incineration is the best way.

[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 8 points 7 months ago

Even in England, our gay PMs have to be married. At least until their wife finds out.

[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 1 points 7 months ago

Which model? I find the 4o to be rubbish; I just get bullshit. 4-turbo was great. 4.5 is the only useful model there at the moment. Perplexity is what I use for searches and it's good on references. ChatGPT for making things.

[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

As a male, none.

Have been helping people in family court for twenty years. The shift had been catastrophic for marriage from a male risk/reward.

[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not criticising you. I cannot validity criticise you, even if I was so inclined (I'm not), because I cannot proficiently grasp the subject matter. I would like to understand, NOT criticise. You've written an engaging piece which is opaque to me; apparently a contradiction. Hopefully I've rephrased that enough times to get across that no criticism is intended. 😁

I don't know the product names. I don't tend to be focused on product names because they come and go. Your first message didn't help me.

Your last precis is just what I needed. Ideal. Thank-you. I now know what you're trying to achieve.

view more: ‹ prev next ›