This is a complex topic, but most marxists think that class and race aren't extricable, but intertwined, and to try to separate them into this situation is "class struggle" and this one is "race struggle" is a false premise.
Marx also thought that he was a discoverer, not inventor of his ideas:
And now as to myself, no credit is due to me for discovering the existence of classes in modern society or the struggle between them. Long before me bourgeois historians had described the historical development of this class struggle and bourgeois economists, the economic anatomy of classes. What I did that was new was to prove: (1) that the existence of classes is only bound up with the particular, historical phases in the development of production, (2) that the class struggle necessarily leads to the dictatorship of the proletariat, (3) that this dictatorship itself only constitutes the transition to the abolition of all classes and to a classless society.
Having a US senator that was an Abu Ghraib (the US torture camp in Iraq) prison guard, seems incredibly on brand.
If you doubt me, then to ask a Palestinian.
Just to clarify this to others:
They aren't fascists, yet they're committing a genocide:
Democrats: against every genocide except the current one.
You'll need to educate yourself on the history of socialist states yourself, I can't do that for you.
A good place to start is the PRC's five dont's, a list of things to avoid at all costs from bourgeois democracy.
Very few modern states are settler states based on native eviction: only the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Israel.
The major colonialist powers of the last few hundred years were a tiny number of european nations.
But unlike a dictatorship, the democracies improved
The US and other capitalist states based on representative democracy aren't democracies, and you'd be hard-pressed to find ppl saying they're improving.
Both plato and aristotle, but aristotle thought that any election-based state turned out in practice, to be an oligarchy or aristocracy, not a democracy (which he define as rule by the poor, with random selection by lot).
Aristotle's politics books 4-6 talk a lot about this:
http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.4.four.html
In other words, what today we call "representative democracy", the ancient greeks correctly identified as oligarchy.
The US and Britain genocided entire continents using representative "democracy" (IE capitalist dictatorship).
Socialist / people's democracy. It takes different forms in different countries, and many countries in the global south that are currently capitalist are starting on that socialist road.
Quote:
If your first instinct as a westerner is to criticize and lecture 3rd world communist movements, instead of learning from their successes, then you have internalized the patronizing arrogance of the colonial system you claim to oppose.
240
Pakistan to respond ‘forcefully’ to India’s ‘act of war’, says prime minister after attack – live
(www.theguardian.com)
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/24853237
Some foreigners say that our ideological reform is brainwashing. As I see it, they are correct in what they say. It is washing brains, that’s what it is! This brain of mine was washed to become what it is. After joining the revolution, it was slowly washed, washed for several decades.
What I received before was all bourgeois education, and even some feudal education.
- Mao Zedong
Such great arguments coming from the mccarthyites today.