ipkpjersi

joined 2 years ago
[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

At this moment there is only one potentially viable way of approaching this and it’s government regulation of some kind. Either government needs to regulate that payment processors get no say in the contents of customers business, or else they need to regulate the adoption of a neutral digital payment system.

I think it's more likely for me to win the mega jackpot, and I don't even buy lottery tickets.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I want a hunt and gatherer girlfriend, wtf. That would be cool.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Hell, I'm sure there are still some places that only have dialup.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 37 points 4 months ago

Obviously not, but it's not like they're gonna be honest and call it the UK Online Spying Act.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

Nothing you say online is private, it can all be copied/screengrabbed/recorded/photographed and shared by the recipient.

Even if you fully trust the recipient, often times it can still be intercepted unless it's end-to-end encrypted, but even then the end device can still be stolen too.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He's right, flash media loses data as unplugged flash memory loses charge over time. It's called charge leakage in flash memory, it's a well-known phenomenon.

A hard drive might work, but, it would need to be stored in some sort of sealed box to keep it safe. It would probably help to also go with optical media as well, assuming we still have something able to read it in X number of years, which we should.

In general though, you'd want multiple copies, as with any data the 3-2-1 backup rule applies, so unfortunately for OP this isn't necessarily something you can do with a very low budget.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I wish they weren't a duopoly. There isn't really any other options even if they would be better, just because of the marketshare hold they have.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

and the pve8to9 checklist script suggests to run this migration script if necessary

Ah, okay that makes more sense.

This is going to affect many more people who didn't read it, then.

Although, that seems to only affect guests and not hosts?

The host machine becomes unbootable IIRC, so I think it's something else?

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Better rain going up than fire coming down.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

I took a look but I'm not seeing any command for LVM mentioned anywhere?

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (5 children)

It might be safer to wait, one of my IRL friends ran into an issue, and I saw some others post about it on the Proxmox forums: TASK ERROR: activating LV 'pve/data' failed: Check of pool pve/data failed (status:64). Manual repair required!

I think I didn't run into that error because I flattened my LVM kinda, but if I hadn't customized my setup maybe I would have run into that too.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I tell myself that every time, but I mean, I still end up doing it every time anyway lmao

edit: Just did it, it went well.

view more: ‹ prev next ›