Absorb blame assumes they would face consequences when things go wrong.
jmcs
Can you imagine your entire job being forecasting what other people's intentions are and making decisions based on it, and being so shit at it that you decide to prop up a guy that's openly saying he's going to obliterate the international economic system that makes your job easy?
That's were the ambiguity comes into play. The laws related to cookies want to allow things like cookies for fraud prevention and antibot protection, the problem starts when the business people say the personalised ad revenue makes it legitimate and the developers and product managers decide that having a bazillion trackers making their job a little easier makes it absolutely essential.
Rejecting cookies without asking every time requires a cookie and that is clearly legitimate interest. The problem with legitimate interest is that it's not well defined enough and then you have companies claiming that Adsense personalization is an absolute necessity for their website.
When you are talking about diplomats, very little.
Poor dude, he's illiterate and doesn't even have a radio or TV.
That's not what the ruling says and repeating that false interpretation only helps Trump.
The more logical choice would be to tax the distribution license sold by non American entities.
The thing that makes this unenforceable is that what he means is that he wants to tax movies not filmed fully in the US even if they are American movies.
The judge and prosecution in the first trial fucked up by including testimony for crimes Weinstein was not accused of, so the trial needs to be repeated. This is the kind of mistake they do in 90% of the cases but Weinstein can afford lawyers that care.
This is not even an American issue, prosecutors all over the world get used to steam rolling poor fool after poor fool so when they face someone that can afford an adequate defence team they are caught with their pants down more often than not.
As long as Google doesn't sell Chrome to OpenAI.
Software company's CEO wants the money to go to his company.