liv

joined 2 years ago
[–] liv@lemmy.nz 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It is not necessarily disrespectful but you do need to know what you are doing and why.

Ideally are you able to make contact with a music teacher or kapa haka teacher from NZ?

I think you would benefit from showing your students some of the footage of students performing kapa haka (on youtube). These kids are about 11.

Also, please do not rely on the Wikihow. Please do not teach your students that any girls doing a pukana are "expressing their sexuality"!!! That is misleading. Here is a resource from New Zealand's educational system, which talks about pukana in a way that is appropriate for 11 year olds.

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (15 children)

I guess the other component is consequences, i.e whose privacy is being breached and what recourse they have. So from that point of view I'd expect organizations like Oranga Tamariki and WINZ to have developed a worse privacy culture than organizations like IRD and MBIE.

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

Thanks :) I quite like how Lemmyvision makes us focus on our local music scenes a bit more.

Went down a real rabbit hole with the UK entry last year too. All these geriatric rappers and their record label was this guy's dairy.

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 0 points 9 months ago (8 children)

I'm actually voting for @eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz's suggestion!

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Mau Moko is awesome. Glad they've still got it!

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 0 points 9 months ago (17 children)

One of their examples was probably the whisper network (warning someone about historic allegations about someone else who probably had contact with them) but some of the others have me scratching my head.

I think what happens sometimes is that over time with underfunding and undertraining you end up with an organizational culture that becomes weirdly blind to privacy issues, like how our birds evolved to not have wings.

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 1 points 9 months ago

I am definitely going to read it now. Streisand effect.

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

If I remember correctly it counts for defamation and name suppression laws, but in this case since the link would just be to OPs own content it probably wouldn't.

It might still be charged under the act though, as bullying, but I am not a lawyer.

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 1 points 9 months ago

If we're allowed January this would be a great choice. Alien Weaponry is impressive as always.

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you have the Mona Lisa in your house then letting the police into your house incriminates you, but the whole point of the search is for them to be able to find it.

I think the right to remain silent was meant to protect us from being tortured, not as a shield to hide things?

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I'm not a legal expert but as far as I know if the police are arresting you they can compel this in New Zealand. There is no difference in unlock methods. People get charges for not complying.

This page seems to back this up but it is old.

view more: ‹ prev next ›