lka1988

joined 1 year ago
[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

laughs in CUPS server

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Oh I love my PineTime. I bought mine two years ago but it never played nice with Gadgetbridge, so it lived in a drawer until last month, when I saw someone had been using theirs pretty regularly with Gadgetbridge. I asked about it and mentioned my difficulties, they said that both had been significantly updated since then. Now here we are. It's a great watch.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

You should just get one anyway. It's $30.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

No way! That's awesome, I will absolutely be checking that out

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

Because that's the feature people actually want. The biggest use of these watches is having an active heart rate monitor, as evident by even most of the cheaper watches having them.

Seriously, even my $30 PineTime has a heart rate monitor.

I've never once used a compass on my watch, mostly because the phone it's attached to is a much better compass and even has its own barometer built-in. Plus it's a pain to use a compass on a watch because you have to hold your whole arm up.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's a pretty bog-standard feature though... My 2008 Toyota has a maintenance reminder light that pops on every 5000 miles.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Glad to be moving to Linux this year, wiping the last of my Windows-based installations out of my house.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 9 months ago

I have a PineTime running through Gadgetbridge, and a Pebble Time Steel with Rebble services. You can pair the Pebble with Gadgetbridge and run it that way, and I imagine these new Core watches would operate similarly... But we will find out as time goes on.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's a fair point. HDR is quite nice, I use it a lot on my Pixel. The TV I mentioned does have dynamic brightness, but that's over the whole TV, not really equivalent to HDR.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

Are they actually any good though? I was looking at a 1440p Sceptre monitor for my PC, and a lot of reviews mentioned huge bezels, dead pixels, and other issues...

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

I believe it, but the Core architecture was a pretty significant upgrade from Netburst. Pentium 4 CPUs were really good at converting electricity to heat 😅

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

A Sharp Aquos TV from the late 2000s, pre-Hisense days. We have a 42" model from ~2007. It's only 1080p (which is honestly just fine for its size and our usage), but there's plenty of I/O for modern and legacy equipment, and lots of configuration options. It is an absolute monster at 75 lbs, but an incredibly high quality unit nonetheless, especially considering it's age. I've owned it since 2019 and it's needed zero repairs or anything.

For comparison, we also have a much newer 55" curved Samsung TV (in our basement, wall-mounted up high) which has already needed a backlight driver board replacement. Luckily that was only $50, but still, I expect better.

view more: ‹ prev next ›