nsrxn

joined 1 month ago
[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

if no one chooses their own mind, why are you trying to convince me of anything. it's completely absurd.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 1 points 5 days ago (23 children)

if the world is deterministic, ethics don't exist.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 2 points 5 days ago (25 children)

if your position is that professional ethicists are wrong, and we shouldn't entertain their stance, I don't see how you're any different from a quack or theologian.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 2 points 5 days ago (27 children)

it's highly relevant to your erroneous claim

"no one should entertain people who value virtue over consequence."

the experts in the field just disagree with this stance.

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 2 points 6 days ago (29 children)

there is a survey of philosophers that shows what I said is true

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 3 points 1 week ago (31 children)

more professional philosophers identify as deontologists than any other ethical system

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 1 points 1 week ago

i just searched for it as a logged-in user.

i also subscribed to the community to keep getting the posts/comments

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

you may just need to sign up for the instance. i tried searching for it in a private tab at mstdn.social and it wouldn't populate

[–] nsrxn@mstdn.social 0 points 1 week ago (5 children)

damn

it shows the full thread here

view more: ‹ prev next ›