oxysis

joined 8 months ago
[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is how a healthy democracy deals with undemocratic parties, you fucking toss them aside and call them what they are. Good for you Germany, may your democracy live long

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 7 months ago

“Democratic” doesn’t seem like the right label for a fascist supporter

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hey look! Someone who can put 2 and 2 together and get 4!

Seriously though this is so fucking predictable why the fuck would they waste their time and resources on this?

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 8 months ago

One I am all for

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 8 months ago

I absolutely agree these “researchers” deserve to lose their tenure and lose their funding. In my mind they don’t even deserve to be called researchers anymore as they view their job as an extractive one. They hold no regard for the people they impacted and how that impacts the entire fields of research.

If the university does protect these people than I can only hope that no one signs up to participate in any future studies they try to conduct.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It sickens me how people use the phrase to justify harming others.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 8 months ago

There are very good reasons why our modern code of ethics exist in the first place. We as researchers are not there to do harm but instead to try to uplift the people we work with in the process. We are not there to extract information, but to work with people to help better understand how to improve their lives.

The Milgram Experiment while fascinating, is deeply unethical in its own right and should not be used as an example of anything other than the damage that is cause by conducting an unethical study. That study alone has cause many would be participants to walk away because how can they be trusted with a new study. The experiment was not stopped by the researchers when it was clear the participants were under high pressure and showing visible signs of stress. This is not an extractive field like you imply, it is a morally bankrupt philosophy to have that mindset.

Compensating participants is a sign of goodwill and shows you value their time and work put in. Does not matter if trauma is brought up or created like with the Milgram Experiment. You do it because it creates goodwill and helps people feel safer in the knowledge that both you and the institution you represent actually care. It is not for debate on what circumstances you offer compensation, you just offer it.

The greater good does not come with predatory extractive experiments but instead with studies that value and care for its participants. It is impossible to know just how many people have been turned away from participating because of studies like the one the article is on, the Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. What we do know is that they have had an extremely negative effect on the perception of academic research and turn people away.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 8 months ago (8 children)

This is deeply unethical, when doing research you need to respect the people who participate and you have to respect what their story is. So by using a regurgitative artificial idiot (RAI) to make them their mind is not respecting them or their story.

The people who are being experimented on were not given compensation for their time and the work they contributed. While it isn’t required it is good practice in research to not actively burn bridges with people so that they will want to participate in more studies.

These people were also not given knowledge they were participating in a study nor were they given the choice to leave with their contributions at their will. Which entirely makes the study unpublishable since the data was not gathered with fucking consent.

This isn’t even taking into account any of the other things which cross ethical lines. All the “researchers” involved should never be allowed to ever conduct or participate in a study of any kind again. Their university should be fined and heavily scrutinized for their work in enabling this shit. These assholes have done damage to all researchers globally who will now have a harder time pitching real studies to potential participants because they could remember this story and how “researchers” took advantage of unknowing individuals. Shame on these people and hope they face real consequences.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I could never imagine wanting to bring a child into this world right now. Poor babies will grow up in a hollow husk of a once beautiful world. They will never get to experience so many beautiful things and will be forced to live in a world that will be fighting over water resources.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 8 months ago

How many cease fires have been put in place?

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Good on them for calling out Israel’s bullshit, genocide is genocide no matter who is doing it

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 8 months ago (8 children)

Steam gets a pass because they actually offer buyer protection, refunds if it doesn’t work, refunds under certain requirements which can be waved under certain circumstances, removal of day one season passes, refunds for dlc that gets delayed too long for example.

If an actual competitor gave a shit about things that matter to actual players than they have a shot. Epic Game Store is a joke because no one wants a store that only focuses on what corporations want. GOG is good but just doesn’t market itself well, seriously outside of launching CDPR games I don’t see it at all.

Getting companies to offer their games on platforms that offer a higher margin is easy. Getting players over to a platform that offers less protections and features is not going to happen.

view more: ‹ prev next ›