scrion

joined 2 years ago
[–] scrion@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Summa Cum Laude maybe?

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The thumbnail of this image looks like a singular eye observing spaghetti.

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was fixed by removing residue from the print bed which reduced adhesion for the first few layers, pulling the filament up, which gets stuck on the nozzle and is being dragged across the bed.

Clean your bed regularly every couple of prints.

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I don't think invasive data collection via black boxes is the way to go. I'd say better driver education, speed traps, and better education for civil servants (such as traffic cops) might be a better solution.

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Additional data about your driving behavior is also collected, completely unrelated to cameras. In fact, this data is the majority.

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 77 points 2 weeks ago
[–] scrion@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

There certainly would be a market for a network camera ecosystem provided by a company that people can trust. I don't think it has to be all or nothing, plenty of people really are in no position to self-host.

I'm not sure if there is anything out there that regular consumers currently could migrate to in case they want to get away from questionable companies. There are completely local systems (local recorder, no remote access), but those are lacking the home automation features / notifications, and well-respected brands that have been around (let's say, Axis?) that are still closed source, not cross-platform and with pricing often not aimed at end customers.

I didn't check out this project, so I'm certainly not saying this is it and there habe been various criticism of this particular project here, but I'd love if a decent project would emerge in the space.

Would you consider using a managed cloud solution + app if it's open-source and properly end-to-end encrypted? How would a hypothetical company have to behave to be trustworthy, while still being allowed to profit? People here seem to like e. g. tuta.io for encrypted mail, I don't see why a similar model could not work for network cameras.

These are genuine questions btw., I myself am really annoyed at the status quo with its data breaches, blatant lies to customers about encryption, and corporations willfully cooperating with fascist governments by proactively providing video data. I'm not even going to talk about AI training.

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] scrion@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This is nonsense. The documentation is readily available, and it takes arguably less time to provide the code to write a single, proper file than to create 50 desktop entries.

This is just ignorance on whoever wrote that part of Krita.

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I'd probably set up some firewall rules / a VLAN to isolate the cameras. I generally don't trust any company to do the reasonable thing, and apparently, these days, we live in a world where many companies are outright malicious.

view more: next ›