shads

joined 2 years ago
[–] shads@lemy.lol 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's so frustrating seeing the government fiddling in the margins to grab headlines rather than, doing something constructive. This is going to devolve into a game of whack-a-mole trying to make it look like it is achieving something other than what it is (normalising the idea of having to dox yourself to access the internet). Meanwhile I have just lost all the passive ability to monitor what my teens watch on YouTube, and the easy ability to check in on their conversations on Snapchat. They have thrown my kids out into the wild west of barely moderated YouTube and dubious chat apps.

If they had implemented strong laws around algorithmic outputs, human moderation, and online harassment then we would have been applauding them for holding the social media companies to account. Instead what they have done is laid another part of the foundation of a surveillance state.

In essence the governments desire to be seen to be doing something is dovetailing neatly with the shit heads that want everything we do online to be monitored, recorded and as a byproduct more heavily monetised.

Also since they are doing this to protect the children, is there a number of children they are willing to sacrifice to achieve their goals. How many marginalised kids have to self harm before they start to ask the question "Are we the baddies?" We already know that social media has had Perverse Incentives at play that have shaped it, so while it sounds hyperbolic I don't imagine it's beyond the pale that the LGBTQI+ kid who lives in a rural area with 0 local support is going to be affected by their online support networks disappearing. The kid suffering from domestic violence suddenly becomes voiceless and can't work out who they trust enough to reach out to. The bullying goes to the all new special app all the kids on the playground are using that is hosted out of another country that doesn't give a shit about Australian laws and becomes impossible to take down as we have just taught our kids to work around the tissue paper blocks the government keeps relying on.

On top of all this, we don't have comprehensive data privacy laws, and while the government says it will levy massive fines against companies that don't take reasonable steps to secure our data, the reality is that they will not, and if they tried to what's to stop the companies deciding that Australia is not an economically sound country to operate in and just up stumps and leave rather than paying the $85,000,000 fine?

This is all just the surface level thoughts I have of this debacle.

[–] shads@lemy.lol 10 points 1 week ago

Hard disagree, at some point investors are going to start asking these AI companies when they will be done burning cash and when the profits will start rolling in. Arguably OpenAI is already starting to see these concerns. If the US gets a new government at some stage there might be enough political will to draw a line in the sand with NVidia and tell them to stop manipulating markets. Finally there may be some pushback against datacenters literally killing the areas they are built in. What we are seeing is a fraud against the world originating from a group of hyper rich arseholes that may last a surprisingly long time, but eventually they will need to pay the piper.

I did have someone tell me this has all the hallmarks of the space race. We are going to see enormous amounts of efforts and resources thrown into AI only for these pioneers to realise there is no clear way to monetise at which point all that energy will be redirected, until then China keeps on egging the US on to make them increasingly commit more and more of their economy to a concept that is going to be a lead anchor on the country left holding the bag.

[–] shads@lemy.lol 2 points 1 week ago

Oh I don't mean to diminish the harms of the movement. We have a disappointingly long history to show what happens when this sort of group is weaponised by the wrong type (I was going to write right type, but that feels wrong) of leader/funder. But on an individual level, can you imagine one of these stains trying to explain their viewpoints to an honest questioner on a one on one basis?

I used to know a powerlifter who looked like what these guys fetishise, but he is their polar opposite ideologically. I would love for him to sit down and in his oh so calm voice ask one of these goons why they think the way they do. Trust me when I say it would never leave their mind that this guy could tear their arms off and beat them with the bloody ends, so if they were stuck next to him on a flight or train ride I think they would be sitting in a couple of different puddles by the end without having made a single valid point, meanwhile my old mate would likely continue his trend of intimidating people before they realise he wouldn't hurt a fly.

[–] shads@lemy.lol 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

So they are LARPers? I mean what a bunch of shitheads, but what a shit society to join. Why would any of them individually want to associate with any of the others? Surely they look around and think "What a pathetic bunch of losers!"

[–] shads@lemy.lol 2 points 1 week ago

I especially like how we are bending over and taking it from a Non-Profit so they can make more money.

[–] shads@lemy.lol 1 points 1 week ago

Did what I could between Peter George and Rosalie Woodruff, but Dean Winter still got back in as did vice chairman Abetz.

As a state though we did the Australian Signature move of voting against our best interests. We aren't quite as polarised as the US yet but I see people whinging about Leftists with disturbing regularity.

Plus the whole way through this stadium crap they have been calling anyone with even basic questions about the process an "Anti". I always wanted to reply with Anti-Corruption, Anti-Crime, Anti-Bankruptcy. But most of those mouth breathers wouldn't appreciate that sort of nuanced position.

[–] shads@lemy.lol 6 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, just look at Discord. Not only harvesting data, by sharing it with "trusted partners" I was told the Esafety commissioner can bring legal action to find companies up to $850k per offence for improperly storing Australian citizens data, but I haven't heard anything about hundreds of millions in fines against Discord yet.

[–] shads@lemy.lol 26 points 4 weeks ago

Just repaying the excess fees is "taking shareholder money". No fines or penalties, just making the original customers whole.

Just make the entire executive team pay the money to the shareholders, problem solved. If they aren't good for it I am sure they can get a line of credit extended to them, pretty sure they know some people in the banking industry.

[–] shads@lemy.lol 8 points 4 weeks ago

So sick of people treating "white" as a racial group. I'm presumably about as white as you get (my father was adopted so no idea about his ancestry, but his bio mother appeared pretty damned white). I don't identify with any of these little, insignificant man-children who are desperate for their hatefulness to make their lives just a little more important.

Plus if they could pull their heads out of their arses for a couple of minutes they would clearly see their grievances would be better directed along class lines, would make a far bigger difference in their lives than trying to pretend anyone with skin darker than weak custard is somehow oppressing them.

[–] shads@lemy.lol 12 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I especially liked this section from the ABC news story ( https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-17/verify-neo-nazi-rally-participant-visa-revoked/106018130 ) about this dickhead:

When ABC NEWS Verify asked Mr Gruter about the bracelet, and other matters, he responded: "Since when is it a crime to love and advocate for your own people?"

If he is so passionate about his own people, maybe he will get a warmer reception when he fucks off back to South Africa to rejoin them. Somehow I doubt it though.

[–] shads@lemy.lol 7 points 1 month ago

So to maintain AI supremacy the US will now phase out all climate targets and begin the great AI vs Climate Collapse race.

People around the world will be on tenterhooks as they see AI get out to an early lead as politicians fire anyone who can call out the ever so subtle "Unprecedented Events".

Gaze in wonder as climate strikes back by disrupting society with apocalyptic weather events to attempt supply chain disruption.

Watch in rapt disgust as the AI instructs the puppet like mouth pieces to pay lip service to citizens while doubling down on supply and logistic support while restricting the publics access to the same.

AI vs Climate Collapse: No matter who wins we lose

[–] shads@lemy.lol 2 points 1 month ago

Over here in Australia the government is being told that the equivalent that we are having foisted on us lacks key supporting measures (like an equivalent of GDPR, actual hard and fast laws to penalise the misuse or failure to adequately secure citizens data, etc).

In spite of this and genuine commentary from children's advocacy groups saying the legislation is not fit for purpose it is being steamrolled through because "won't somebody think of the children".

It does make me wonder how many children are going to be cut off from their support networks and escape routes that this might harm, potentially fatally. How much blood of Australia's youth is our government willing to have on its hands so that our intelligence community (and we are part of five eyes so it doesn't stay on our shores) can have a shiny new toy?

view more: ‹ prev next ›