They don't have your private key
talkingpumpkin
What risk are you trying to mitigate, specifically?
If it's the CA taking over your site, control over your CA specifically doesn't really give any advantage to an attacker (they would have to hijack traffic and provide a new certificate - nobody will notice if the certificate is from a different CA).
Note that your CA cannot decrypt the exchanges between your server and its clients.
Didn't read the article but I love the braindead chart:

FILENAME='birthday_0' $(cat command_ffmpeg_SYNCAUD)
cat prints out a file without altering it's contents.
If it's important to keep the commands in a separate file, you could use sed to find/replace, or use eval, or use some external template engine (lookup "bash expand variables in file").
What you probably want to do instead, I assume, is to replace the external files with regular bash variables:
filename="some-file"
command="ffmpg -i ${filename}.mpg -bla -blabla ${filename}.mkv"
echo "$command"
IDK what makes Eric Bailey prefer a cooperative to a non-profit, the article doesn't explain it.
Unlike corporations, co-ops don’t have to be motivated by profit. Not needing to focus growth at all costs means co-ops can instead prioritize and incentivise things like preservation and cultivation. It is also a successful model of operation [links to a page titled "employee ownership"], one that even already exists and flourishes in the tech space [links to a page about a specific software consultancy coop that doesn't publish a knowledge website].
I might be jumping the gun here, but... it would seem he doesn't really know what the point of a cooperative is?
I agree.
Leaving so abruptly may not be the classiest move but it's not like one can't leave if he so decides.
The dev will be fine and so will void. Nothing to see here for now.
I'm not saying you are wrong (not saying you are right either), but... your comment sounds a lot like "trust me, I have a conflict of interest" :)
I love this Omarchy thing: it's helping separate the wheat from the chaff.
I only wished there was a site that listed all the "bad" guys... they seem to be way more numerous than I imagined.
TIL, thanks!
IIUC the EUPL is more similar to the GPL that the AGPL (ie. there's no "network use" clause)
edit: seems like IDUC - see comment below
is
: <<EOF
text
text
EOF
a bash-ism?

Yep, that's what I described and any CA accepted by the client can do it