IIUC the EUPL is more similar to the GPL that the AGPL (ie. there's no "network use" clause)
edit: seems like IDUC - see comment below
IIUC the EUPL is more similar to the GPL that the AGPL (ie. there's no "network use" clause)
edit: seems like IDUC - see comment below
is
: <<EOF
text
text
EOF
a bash-ism?
I hope this is not against rules 4 and 6, but... I fear it might be?
If you want me to remove the post just tell me (or report it to the mods, of course).
I'm only sharing this because I found it very funny :)
That's way too tame... I fear it won't attract 8M in funding.
Jokes aside, the Christian commandments are quite lacking (insufficient) when it comes to contemporary morals... eg. there's nothing forbidding discrimination or violence (short of homicide) or slavery or corruption or torture or neglicence etc. (and this is if one quite generously interprets "your neighbor" as "anybody else", which is clearly not what the word means and which doesn't explain why only some of the precepts have this "universal restriction").
I always find it weird when people cite the commandments as a moral compass without integrating them with (very much necessary) additional prescriptions.
It’s part of the official install docs for docker
Not true.
The "add user to docker group" thing is not part of the install instructions (also, there is no official install docs for arch - but that's a moot point), it's in a separate document that literally starts with [emphasis mine] "These optional post-installation procedures describe how to configure your Linux host machine to work better with Docker" and contains a big orange box warning about that being part of the docker group is equivalent to being root.
Even if you think the docker doc could trick a newbie into thinking it's ok to make your user part of the docker group (which I'd argue it doesn't), you have to consider that:
You can say that the whole "docker group" thing is a very stupid idea and that it's existence is squarely on the docker's devs, and you could even argue that it's a trap, but there cannot be any doubt that falling for this trap (that has big "this is a trap!" signs all over) is a major blunder for a distro.
it’s a group that gets automatically when you install it on any distro.
The issue is not the group existing, the issue is your user being part of that group.
Yes, you can make your user part of the docker group if you so chose, but distros should not make that very unwise choice for you per default (just as they shouldn't set things up to encourage you logging in as root or configure passwordless sudo for your user).
Thanks for the correction!
The distro is (reportedly - I'm not touching it) just arch + hyprland + dotfiles scripts, the main dev is the same dev behind hyprland (who's right-leaning to say the least), and the money comes from right-leaning-to-say-the-least entrepreneurs.
errata: read the reply below
Most probably those services are started because some other service depends on them.
After running systemctl disable someservice the service someservice is not "disabled" in the sense that it can't be started, it merely isn't started automatically at startup. If you want to make a service not startable, use systemctl mask (or, you know, uninstall/delete it?).
systemctl list-dependencies --reverse mysql.service should list the services that depend on mysql.service.
It's great to see more and more project leaving github!
PS: "Live Demo" on https://www.pdfding.com/ is a dead link
Wow. Do they block VPNs inside your country too?
Anyway, there's openvpn and there's nebula (I think nebula doesn't use wireguard.. do double-check), or you look into things built specifically to hide traffic (keyword: "vpn obfuscation").
No idea if VPN protocols other than wireguard may be blocked too (probably?).
No idea if trying too hard to circumvent government policies may get you added to some list you'd rather not be in.
TIL, thanks!