unfreeradical

Fortunately, there often seems also to be a surplus of useless idiots.

You are continuing to be narrow and obtuse, now seemingly deliberately.

I simply will repeat that "two-state solution" encompasses a broad and open range of concrete possibilities.

Vagueness challenges the particular, narrow representation you insist is universally accepted.

There is no concrete catalog that affirms which representations are "actually existing". There is rather open discourse with diverse contributions.

You are being overly narrow.

The "two-state solution" is a vague proposal that encompasses a very broad range of concrete possibilities.

One might say it is a range of different proposals all described under a common phrase.

We should not pigeonhole the phrase into one particular, narrow representation insisted as the one "normally understood".

Simply, I question the narrowness of your characterization.

As insinuated, an objective of full parity among all current occupants of Palestine, settler and Palestinian, including freedom of movement for Palestinians throughout the entire territory, would seem to be sufficient to achieve a dismantlement of settler-colonialism in the region.

"One of those states is Israel" is not a meaningful argument, because it begs the question of which transformations may have been imposed on Israel and the territory.

It’s why OP was banned from other places.

The purpose of the post and community is for others to appraise the justification for the moderator action, not summarily to assume its correctness and then simply to explain its merits.

The link I posted has numerous people explain that advocating for the liberation of Palestine isn’t the same as advocating for a genocide or expulsion of Jews in Israel.

None if it bears on whether advocacy for a "two-state solution" is necessarily Zionism.

You introduced Zionism into the discussion.

I question that advocacy for a "two-state solution" is necessarily Zionism, whereas your complaint rests squarely on such an assumption. The entire settler population being expelled is not feasible. Zionism should not be represented so broadly as to include everyone who is merely practical.

Your grievances about a thread from nine months ago obviously are irrelevant.

I find your deflections and extrapolations both completely irrelevant and also deeply distorted.

I hope to find peace as I continue using SLRPNK, as it is an instance not federated with Hexbear.

Hexbear users chose to participate in a discussion, community, and site in which such comments are not unwelcome. The comments observed applicable rules. The actions undertaken are quite markedly unreasonable.

When seeking out ever more users to ban becomes an end in itself, an objective of transparency no longer carries any value.

I hope to find my own peace using an instance not federated with Hexbear.