zbyte64

joined 2 years ago
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 20 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Where do you think the Nazis got the salutes from? And for that matter, where do you think we got the word fascism from?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When requirements are "Whatever" then by all means use the "Whatever" machine: https://eev.ee/blog/2025/07/03/the-rise-of-whatever/

And then look for a better gig because such an environment is going to be toxic to your skill set. The more exacting the shop, the better they pay.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Literally the opposite experience when I helped material scientists with their R&D. Breaking in production would mean people who get paid 2x more than me are suddenly unable to do their job. But then again, our requirements made sense because we would literally look at a manual process to automate with the engineers. What you describe sounds like hell to me. There are greener pastures.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 1 year ago

The stock market makes no sense to me.

That's because "The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent."

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Maybe it is because I started out in QA, but I have to strongly disagree. You should assume the code doesn't work until proven otherwise, AI or not. Then when it doesn't work I find it is easier to debug you own code than someone else's and that includes AI.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 1 year ago

Why would you ever yell at an employee unless you're bad at managing people? And you think you can manage an LLM better because it doesn't complain when you're obviously wrong?

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

A junior developer actually learns from doing the job, an LLM only learns when they update the training corpus and develop an updated model.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It’s usually vastly easier to verify an answer than posit one, if you have the patience to do so.

I usually write 3x the code to test the code itself. Verification is often harder than implementation.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 8 points 1 year ago

DOGE has entered the chat

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When LLMs get it right it's because they're summarizing a stack overflow or GitHub snippet it was trained on. But you loose all the benefits of other humans commenting on the context, pitfalls and other alternatives.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 3 points 1 year ago

Pepper Ridge Farms remembers when you could just do a web search and get it answered in the first couple results. Then the SEO wars happened....

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago

The new talking point is that man made climate change is real but burning oil isn't causing the world to warm. But that does mean we can geoengineer our climate to be cooler. 🙃

view more: ‹ prev next ›