“I was targeted for transfer to prevent my supporters from helping me.”

In this video, we dive deep into the complex and controversial story of the Hong Kong protests and the growing Hong Kong independence movement. From the 2019 Hong Kong riots to the 2020 Hong Kong National Security Law, the media narrative has been heavily shaped by Western media bias, leaving out key context. Was it truly about freedom and democracy, or is there a deeper agenda at play?

We explore how the West interference in Hong Kong and China’s policies towards the region have played a pivotal role in escalating the conflict. From the Hong Kong extradition bill to the rise of Hong Kong separatism, we challenge the portrayal of these events and question whether they were truly about Hong Kong democracy or something more politically driven. What role does racial violence and racism play in these protests? How do Hong Kong culture and Hong Kong language debate factor into the crisis?

We also look at the economic collapse caused by the riots, the influence of foreign powers, and how the Beijing Hong Kong policy has stabilized the region post-protests. Don't miss out on understanding the true impact of China Hong Kong stability and why the Hong Kong protests 2020 changed everything for the city.

We also address the cantonese language debate and why it's central to the evolving identity of Hong Kongers, as well as China Cantonese policies that are shaping this cultural landscape.

cross-posted from: https://lemmings.world/post/35793112

The right loves throwing around the word "insane" when they talk about the Left.

Uh-huh.

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/29166739

The meth explains a lot about the decision making in this story.

I'm at my wits end trying to figure it out. I've tried pressing the button even more to fix the issue but even with that it's still getting worse??

I don't know what could possibly be causing this. The only thing I can think of is that women are getting too uppity on account of having too many rights. Sounds bad but I don't know what else I could even try. I already tried pressing the button a bunch of times.

Fortunately, we've found someone to press the button even harder, and who hates women's rights, and best of all, she is a woman so nobody gets to complain about it.

Oh I just realized I forgot to introduce myself. My name is Japan.

I visited it's food court during lunch several times over the last 2 years, the place was always a ghost town.

The nazi tattoo is like my biggest red flag and I can't tell if I've just because of B.J. Blazkowicz

Technical Safety BC has released some shocking video of an explosion last year at an electric vehicle charging station in Hope B.C.

In a report, the organization said a driver was trying to charge his Tesla at a non-Tesla EV charger.

A short circuit between the owner’s charging adapter and the provided cable caused an arc flash, knocking the driver to the ground. A person can be seen getting out of the passenger seat of the car following the explosion.

The driver suffered minor injuries, and the adapter was destroyed, according to Technical Safety BC.

The report blamed several factors for the explosion, including the aftermarket adapter that was used.

The driver said he had used it many times without issue but it was not certified in Canada, nor approved by Tesla, the report found.

lol what was up with that? Gotta wonder what's next white men will cling onto that will make them great again.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/51459377

Hi everyone, I recently purchased a new car (24 mazda cx5) that supports android auto. I've never had this feature before and so I'm new to it, but so far it's been working really well. I am having an issue with voice commands, specifically for calling and texting. Voice commands work for changing music or playing something else from my playlist, but when I say "call mom" for example, it pops up what I said on screen but then nothing happens. I have tried multiple times with different ppl and I have tried sending texts. It will register what I am saying but then it just goes back to Google maps. I know calling works through the car tho, because I have recieved calls and if I use the touch screen to access my contacts, I can make call that way. It will also notify me when I recieve a text message. And I know I have service when I have tried to make calls. I tried searching online but didn't have much luck. Thanks!

At my insistence we bought a Canon laser all in one printer in 2022. It's turning out to be more trouble than it's worth, and it can't do some stuff that some family members need, like printing on thick card stock.

I do, however, like the fact that the Canon reports toner levels to HA. Is there a normie inkjet printer that also has this functionality and won't fleece us with BS ink subscriptions and lock us into using their ink?

I'd also like it to be JUST a printer, not an all-in-one. I'm looking at a dedicated scanner, which doesn't need an HA integration.

SponsorBlock Timestamps:

1. 0:00.000 - 2:54.000 Intermission
2. 2:54.000 - 3:40.500 Hook/Greetings
3. 3:40.500 - 3:49.500 Theme: I Smell Trouble
4. 3:49.500 - 6:04.000 Thumbnail Segment Overview
5. 6:04.000 - 7:36.200 Intro: Larry Sharpe Governor Ad
6. 7:36.200 - 53:39.300 Larry Sharpe Joins
7. 53:39.300 - 53:45.000 Theme: I Smell Trouble
8. 53:45.000 - 54:56.500 Unpaid/Self Promotion
9. 54:56.500 - 56:03.500 Viewer Comments
10. 56:03.500 - 56:13.500 Interaction Reminder
11. 56:13.500 - 56:16.500 Tangents
12. 56:16.500 - 56:19.500 Theme: I Smell Trouble
13. 56:19.500 - 1:18:49.000 SNAP Benefits at Risk, Gov't Shutdown Continues, California Food Banks, Mutual Aid, Building Community
14. 1:18:49.000 - 1:36:05.500 Zohran Soars, Polling Update, Curtis Sliwa, Andrew Cuomo
15. 1:36:05.500 - 1:36:18.000 Tangents
16. 1:36:18.000 - 1:36:26.500 Interaction Reminder
17. 1:36:26.500 - 1:36:29.000 Theme: I Smell Trouble
18. 1:36:29.000 - 1:55:16.500 AIPAC Fundraising Scheme, FEC Report Evasion, Democracy Engine LLC, Evanston Now (Matthew Eadie) article: AIPAC donors flood Fine's campaign
19. 1:55:16.500 - 1:55:31.300 Tangents
20. 1:55:31.300 - 2:27:52.800 Pastor Shamed, Viral Video, Distractify (Elizabeth Randolph) article, BET (Clay Cane) article, "Letter from a Birmingham Jail [King Jr.]", Community
21. 2:27:52.800 - 2:28:06.300 Tangents
22. 2:28:06.300 - 2:51:53.000 Joe Rogan Comedy War
23. 2:51:53.000 - 2:57:17.000 EricT Red Joins, Podcast and Comedian wars, Sabby says bye, Eleven Demands, Viewer Comments, Live again on Thursday
24. 2:57:17.000 - 2:58:04.692 Endcards/Credits

Video Description:

#joeroganpodcast #sabbysabs #nycmayorelection #andrewschultz #marvinwinans #benjaminnetanyahu #larrysharpe #geopoliticsinconflict

About Channel:

Leftist news commentary & interviews. Fighting for political and social change. Sabby Sabs podcast is a part of Revolutionary Blackout Network.

Edit:

1. Removed Live info, added video length, completed SponorBlock Timestamps pts 1-24

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/37597470

SponsorBlock, Timestamps, and Generated Summary below:

SponsorBlock Timestamp:

1. 1:16:11.000 - 1:16:29.954 Endcards/Credits

Video Description:

How should the security needs of great powers be balanced with the sovereignty of smaller nations on their border? The concept of Spheres of Security limits the activity of other borders of other great powers. Mexico has the freedom to engage in political and economic cooperation with any state, yet Mexico does not have the freedom to host Russian missiles or Chinese military bases. This is common sense and must be applied to all great powers, yet how feasible is such an agreement between the great powers?

John J. Mearsheimer is the R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, where he has taught since 1982. Jeffrey D. Sachs is a world-renowned economics professor, bestselling author, innovative educator, and global leader in sustainable development.

Generated Summary:

Spheres of Security to Prevent World War III: A Discussion with Jeffrey Sachs & John Mearsheimer

This video features a discussion between Professor John Mearsheimer and Professor Jeffrey Sachs, moderated by Glenn, on the concept of "Spheres of Security" as a potential solution to balance the security needs of great powers with the sovereignty of smaller nations, aiming to prevent conflicts that could escalate to World War III.

Key Points & Arguments:

• The Problem: The discussion begins with the challenge of balancing the security needs of great powers with the sovereignty of smaller nations, particularly those bordering great powers. Inviting another great power for protection can turn vulnerable states into existential threats, leading to fierce responses and potential war.
• Jeffrey Sachs' Perspective:
  • Sachs proposes the idea of a "sphere of security" as an improvement over the traditional "sphere of influence."
  • He emphasizes the importance of great powers staying out of each other's "lanes" or "neighborhoods" to avoid direct confrontation.
  • Sachs draws on Mearsheimer's work, particularly "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics," to highlight the inherent dangers of great power competition.
  • He stresses the nuclear age as a critical factor, arguing that any conflict between major powers could escalate to mutual annihilation.
  • Sachs advocates for a "golden rule" approach, suggesting that the U.S. should respect the security concerns of Russia and China in their respective regions, similar to how the U.S. views its own neighborhood (Monroe Doctrine).
  • He differentiates between "sphere of security" and "sphere of influence," arguing against interference in the internal affairs or government selection of smaller countries within a security sphere, advocating instead for non-interference in military terms.
  • He references historical examples such as Franklin Roosevelt's "Good Neighbor Policy" and the "Confucian Peace" to illustrate periods where dominant powers exercised self-restraint for long-term stability.
  • Sachs clarifies that a sphere of security is not an economic exclusive zone, allowing for trade, investment, and normal relations, but excluding military presence and threat points.
• John Mearsheimer's Critique:
  • Mearsheimer acknowledges the importance of avoiding great power war and agrees with Sachs on many issues, including the catastrophic mistake of expanding NATO into Ukraine.
  • He credits Sachs with inventing the concept of "spheres of security."
  • Mearsheimer defines spheres of influence as geographical regions that great powers dominate, excluding other great powers and managing the politics of smaller states within the region.
  • He characterizes Sachs' "spheres of security" as aiming for mutual recognition of non-interference, reducing incentives for great powers to meddle in the politics of minor powers.
  • Mearsheimer argues that Sachs is attempting to move away from a zero-sum world (where one state's gain is another's loss) towards an indivisibility of security (where one state cannot enhance its security at the expense of another).
  • Three Main Problems with Sachs' Concept:
    1. Difficulty in Defining Spheres: Mearsheimer argues that it's often difficult to define the geographical boundaries of a sphere, citing East Asia and Central/Western Europe as examples.
    2. Security Competition Outside Spheres: He questions whether security competition outside the defined spheres will inevitably bleed into those spheres, leading to interference and a return to spheres of influence.
    3. Uncertainty and Dynamic Change: Mearsheimer believes it's hard to maintain mutual security guarantees due to the uncertainty and constant change in international politics. He suggests that great powers will always seek opportunities to gain an advantage, potentially leading to interference in each other's spheres.
• Overall Aim: The discussion aims to explore whether the concept of spheres of security can offer a viable framework for managing great power relations and preventing conflicts in a multipolar world, particularly in the context of nuclear weapons.

About Channel:

Glenn Diesen is a professor at the University of South-Eastern Norway (USN), and Associate Editor at Russia in Global Affairs. Diesen's research focus is geoeconomics, conservatism, Russian foreign policy & Greater Eurasia.

Professor Diesen is an academic, author, editor, and political commentator. His research focus is primarily on Russian foreign policy and the geoeconomics of Greater Eurasia and the emerging strategic partnership between Russia and China. Diesen’s latest books are Russophobia: Propaganda in International Politics (2022), Europe as the Western Peninsula of Greater Eurasia: Geoeconomic Regions in a Multipolar World (2021); Russian Conservatism: Managing Change under Permanent Revolution (2021); Great Power Politics in the Fourth Industrial Rivalry: The Geoeconomics of Technological Sovereignty (2021); The Return of Eurasia (2021); Russia in a Changing World (2020); The Decay of Western Civilisation and Resurgence of Russia: Between Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft (2018); Russia’s Geoeconomic Strategy for a Greater Eurasia (2017); and EU and NATO relations with Russia: After the collapse of the Soviet Union (2015).

It is technically fiber optic, but the connection between the home and the distribution box still relies on copper cables.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/51459377