this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025

-7 points (41.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1626 readers

11 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.

Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules

Post only about bans or other sanctions that you have received from a mod or admin.
Don’t use private communications to prove your point. We can’t verify them and they can be faked easily.
Don’t deobfuscate mod names from the modlog with admin powers.
Don’t harass mods or brigade comms. Don’t word your posts in a way that would trigger such harassment and brigades.
Do not downvote posts if you think they deserved it. Use the comment votes (see below) for that.
You can post about power trippin’ in any social media, not just lemmy. Feel free to post about reddit or a forum etc.
If you are the accused PTB, while you are welcome to respond, please do so within the relevant post.

Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.

Some acronyms you might see.

PTB - Power-Tripping Bastard: The commenter agrees with you this was a PTB mod.
YDI - You Deserved It: The commenter thinks you deserved that mod action.
YDM new - You Deserved More: The commenter thinks you got off too lightly.
BPR - Bait-Provoked Reaction: That mod probably overreacted in charged situation, or due to being baited.
CLM - Clueless Mod: The mod probably just doesn't understand how their software works.

Relevant comms

!fediverselore@lemmy.ca

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com

unruffled@anarchist.nexus

-7

Banned for "Propaganda" (mander.xyz)

submitted 1 week ago by phdeeznuts@mander.xyz to c/yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

99 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://mander.xyz/post/42872387

I received insults

Someone even posted photos of dead bodies

These comments weren't reviewed, but I was permanently blocked because my political stance is to hope for the reunification of my country. They said I have nothing to offer, just spreading propaganda and negativity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Look, obviously I’m not going to humour this deliberately playing dumb. You know what the difference is.

No, I do not. I will not stop. The question remains unanswered: What’s the difference? Would it be justiified for France to notice that Wallonia hasn’t held a referendum on joining them, invade and then hold their own referendum there?

So, in short, you do not support the right of self determination for the people of Donbas.

I reject that Russia is credibly representing the self-determination of the people of the Donbas, Zap Oblast or Kherson by holding sham elections in territory they don't even entirely control. What about those who fled those areas?

Better system than your “referendums are only legitimate if they agree with what I want” perspective.

So you unironicaly believe that someone must believe that any referendum ever, regardless of context, regardless of voting methods, regardless of conduct should be accepted or all rejected?

That I must believe that the Quebec referendums in Canada are on the same credibilty level of the Austrian Anschluss?

I have repeatedly told you that the referendum was before the invasion. I can only assume that you pretending otherwise is just another instance of you deliberately wasting time.

You mean the referendum held in an area 1/4 the overall size of the Donbass? Where most people from the Donbass couldn't vote? That referendum?

For the obvious reasons you’re well aware of. If you keep doing this, I’m going to start doing it too, so don’t complain about it when I do.

So no ability to answer. As usual.

I have repeatedly told you that the referendum was before the invasion. I can only assume that you pretending otherwise is just another instance of you deliberately wasting time.

You do realise that (1) that referendum only took place in a small pocket of the Donbas.

Nor that does that, even if somehow representative, account for the citizens of the Zap or Kherson oblasts.

Ironically though, that means all of your arguments now apply to Ukraine. Hmm, yes, were people permitted to publicly campaign for leaving Ukraine? Oh wait, never mind; Ukraine just declared the whole referendum illegal. Oops

Why would Ukraine acknowledge and legitimise a referendum held by occupying powers who forcibly took land from them?

No. That was not your logic. Once again, you can’t even remember your own position.

Yes, it was.

What about the immediate and obvious conflict of interest from the country that controls the region refusing to recognize their desire to leave?

Absolutely. But do you have any credible evidence that a majority of people from the Donbass wanted to leave? Or in Kherson or in the Zap oblast?

Better system than your “referendums are only legitimate if they agree with what I want” perspective.

So you do, what, reject or accept all referendums do you?

You still haven't given me a single reason to accept the Russian referendums held in 2022 in occupied Donbass/Kherson/Zap as fairly conducted.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, I do not. I will not stop. The question remains unanswered: What’s the difference? Would it be justiified for France to notice that Wallonia hasn’t held a referendum on joining them, invade and then hold their own referendum there?

Look, obviously I’m not going to humour this deliberately playing dumb. You know what the difference is.

I reject that Russia is credibly representing the self-determination of the people of the Donbas, Zap Oblast or Kherson by holding sham elections in territory they don’t even entirely control. What about those who fled those areas?

I have repeatedly told you that the referendum was before the invasion. I can only assume that you pretending otherwise is just another instance of you deliberately wasting time.

So you unironicaly believe that someone must believe that any referendum ever, regardless of context, regardless of voting methods, regardless of conduct should be accepted or all rejected?

Better system than your “referendums are only legitimate if they agree with what I want” perspective.

You mean the referendum held in an area 1/4 the overall size of the Donbass? Where most people from the Donbass couldn’t vote? That referendum?

The one you had to be repeatedly told happened before the Russian invasion.

So no ability to answer. As usual.

Ok, I'll start doing it to. What do you mean? I clearly gave you an answer. As I have mostly. What do you think "giving an answer" means? And what do you think "usual" means?

You do realise that (1) that referendum only took place in a small pocket of the Donbas.

You didn't even know what year it took place in before this conversation

Nor that does that, even if somehow representative, account for the citizens of the Zap or Kherson oblasts.

You also clearly don't realize that they aren't part of Donbas.

Yes, it was.

Nope. Anyone can go back and read what you said.

Why would Ukraine acknowledge and legitimise a referendum held by occupying powers who forcibly took land from them?

I have repeatedly told you that the referendum was before the invasion. I can only assume that you pretending otherwise is just another instance of you deliberately wasting time.

Absolutely. But do you have any credible evidence that a majority of people from the Donbass wanted to leave?

So no, you don't recognize the conflict of interest.

So you do, what, reject or accept all referendums do you?

Better system than your “referendums are only legitimate if they agree with what I want” perspective.

You still haven’t given me a single reason to accept the Russian referendums held in 2022 in occupied Donbass/Kherson/Zap as fairly conducted.

I have repeatedly told you that the referendum was before the invasion. I can only assume that you pretending otherwise is just another instance of you deliberately wasting time.

[–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Look, obviously I’m not going to humour this deliberately playing dumb. You know what the difference is.

I will not stop. The question remains unanswered: What’s the difference? Would it be justiified for France to notice that Wallonia hasn’t held a referendum on joining them, invade and then hold their own referendum there?

I have repeatedly told you that the referendum was before the invasion. I can only assume that you pretending otherwise is just another instance of you deliberately wasting time.

And I've repeatedly replied that the post-2014 referendums held by the Luhansk's People's Republic and Donetsk Republic don't represent everyone in the Donbass. Is that the referendum you are referring to here?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Donbas_status_referendums

Are you referring to these?

Better system than your “referendums are only legitimate if they agree with what I want” perspective.

That's not my perspective.

The one you had to be repeatedly told happened before the Russian invasion.

No, I knew that happened. I just didn't think you genuinely thought a referendum that took place in a pocket of the Donbass area was somehow binding on the entire population of the Donbass. Apparently I was wrong.

Ok, I’ll start doing it to. What do you mean? I clearly gave you an answer. As I have mostly. What do you think “giving an answer” means? And what do you think “usual” means?

No, you've hardly provided any answers.

You didn’t even know what year it took place in before this conversation

As I said: No, I knew that happened. I just didn't think you genuinely thought a referendum that took place in a pocket of the Donbass area was somehow binding on the entire population of the Donbass. Apparently I was wrong.

You also clearly don’t realize that they aren’t part of Donbas.

No. I've pointed out that Russia also held sham referendums in the Kherson and the Zap oblasts. That even if the Donbass referendums prior to 2022 in the 2014-22 republics were somehow meaningful - that wouldn't somehow bind Kherson and the Zap oblasts. Russia also claims them too. What does the Donbass have to do with them? All you do when I bring them up is say that they're irrelevant, for some reason.

Nope. Anyone can go back and read what you said.

No, it was not. That was not ever my position.

I have repeatedly told you that the referendum was before the invasion. I can only assume that you pretending otherwise is just another instance of you deliberately wasting time.

As I said: I'm well aware of the referendums that the breakaway states conducted. I don't see how they're especially authoritative for the reasons I've already provided.

So no, you don’t recognize the conflict of interest.

Not what I asked you: Do you have any credible evidence that a majority of people from the Donbass wanted to leave?

Better system than your “referendums are only legitimate if they agree with what I want” perspective.

That's not what I asked you. You seem to have a binary view on all referendums. So do you reject or accept them all?

You can't do both.

I have repeatedly told you that the referendum was before the invasion. I can only assume that you pretending otherwise is just another instance of you deliberately wasting time.

As I said: I'm well aware of the referendums that the breakaway states conducted. I don't see how they're especially authoritative for the reasons I've already provided.