this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
368 points (99.7% liked)

World News

51064 readers
1525 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/39664905

Lieutenant General Christian Freuding fears the longstanding military partnership between the two allies is unravelling under President Trump’s administration

The Pentagon has “cut off contact” between American defence officials and their German counterparts, according to the head of Germany’s army.

The United States has traditionally treated Germany as one of its most important European allies. It is thought to have about 35,000 soldiers stationed at German bases such as Ramstein and Stuttgart, which serve as staging posts for American operations across Africa and the Middle East.

Since President Trump’s return to power in January, the relationship between the countries has become markedly cooler.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

However, Germany could just refuse to allow anyone to supply food, power, petrol etc. to American bases

Why would German business interests turn down lucrative contracts to supply heavily marked up commodities to a captive clientele? And why would the German state government interfere with the finances of prolific political donors?

Maybe the German citizenry could boycott the bases. But they'd need a large nationalist labor movement for that kind of effort. And I'm not seeing it happen in a nation as sharply divided along regional and ethnic lines.

The reason nato was created was the threat of the soviet Russian empire

Not until after the Korean War, and the official entrance of West Germany to NATO, did the goal shift to Soviet containment. The original explicit stated purpose of the organization was to prevent German re-militarization - a perceived error of the original WW1 settlement. Soviet Russia was considered an ally and partner in this purpose under FDR and only became a belligerent under Truman, in the scramble to entrench capitalism as the primary economic model of the Pacific Rim.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

If they wanted them gone bad enough, they could starve them out. I'm not sure how you've convinced yourself that isn't a possible option for them, if pushed far enough. I'm not saying they will but the idea that they couldn't is just ridiculous.

Nato was formed in 1949 which was before the korea war and was always about preventing soviet aggression. No amount of pretending otherwise will change that. Britain and America had already occupied Germany after ww2 and that didn't officially end until 1955. I get it, you don't like nato but you're not doing you side any favours here.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If they wanted them gone bad enough, they could starve them out.

Who is "they"? Clearly, the German business class don't want American soldiers gone. They're a profit center. And the locals who have to deal with these dickbags running around, crashing vehicles, assaulting people at bars, and otherwise making anyone within half a mile of a base miserable clearly don't have any kind of actual economic control of the municipalities.

Nato was formed in 1949 which was before the korea war and was always about preventing soviet aggression.

Why wasn't West Germany invited until six years later?

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Your mad scrambling to not back down over a very silly statement is getting boring now. The fact that you genuinely think that there's literally nothing Germany could ever do to be rid of American soldiers, if they wanted to, is just bizzare and has no basis in reality.

Why wasn’t West Germany invited until six years later?

Because of WW2. You've heard of that one right? Sheer desperation and very little thought going on here.