this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
340 points (98.9% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

6356 readers
288 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More farmers FOFA.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aramis87@fedia.io 16 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Schweitzer said the Montana Farmers Union supports tariffs that are done strategically and targeted, but he adds that isn't the case with recent implementations.

Like so many Republicans, be didn't have a problem with what's being done, just with the way it's implemented.

However, a bipartisan bill could help manage more tariffs from being added. The Trade Review Act of 2025 would require the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of imposing or increasing a duty on imported goods, including an explanation and assessment of its impact on U.S. businesses and consumers.

A) That's not going to do anything; and B) the Republicans already signed a bill last month, saying that the entire rest of the year is one day long explicitly so they wouldn't have to do anything about the tariffs.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah. They're fine with fucking everyone else over. It's when it's them that is being fucked they have a problem.

Too bad, so sad, get fucked.

[–] Narauko@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Being pro-tariff can (and should) be like being pro-modern medicine. Targeted use saves lives, but the only difference between medicine and poison is the dosage and treatment vector. Tariffs should be used like every other regulation on the economy, but since Reagan the dosages of every regulation have all been way out of whack either way too low or way too high. There is a place for some protectionism, just not like this obviously.

load more comments (2 replies)