this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
361 points (98.9% liked)

World News

46090 readers
2964 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 147 points 1 week ago (55 children)

I keep saying it all the time

It isn't about the QUANTITY of life

It's about the QUALITY of life

What sense does it make if you raise your population and everyone is miserably poor or on the edge of becoming poor?

It makes more sense if you just concentrate on making life more manageable, comfortable and sensible for the population you already have. Once you have a comfortable stable population of people who no longer worry about their future .... then they will be more likely to have a family.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

But this idea that more people leads to lower quality of life… that’s 1980s overpopulation panic talking.

Japan’s quality of life is suffering because they don’t have enough working age people to support their society.

Literally, we are going to have some difficulties in the coming decades because we don’t have enough people.

I’m not saying more people is always better, or that we have no limits. But when there are more old people than young people, that’s a bad situation, plain and simple.

[–] courageousstep@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Nah, tax the billionaires to bring money back to the working class and to fund the nursing homes. There are enough resources to support an elderly population, it’s all just being hoarded by assholes.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Money isn't a person, though, you still need some people to work in industry, unless autonomous bots are your thing

[–] courageousstep@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Society will just reorganize to provide. There are a ton of bullshit jobs out there that don’t need to be filled. The higher pay (specifically designed to be high to attract workers) will attract people to work the homes.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

By what means will society be completely reorganized to fit this need? You’re waving this away but it’s wreaking actual devastation across Japan right now, and more countries are trending this direction soon, notably China.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I like the autonomous bot solution. Japan in particular is developing elder care robots.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (50 replies)