this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
740 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
3933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xartle@reddthat.com 42 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

I don't think anyone actually read the announcement, just the headline. Here was the new CEOs actual first point.

"First: Every product we build must give people agency in how it works. Privacy, data use, and AI must be clear and understandable. Controls must be simple. AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off. People should know why a feature works the way it does and what value they get from it."

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

By people he means other CEOs.

[–] Dazed_Confused@lemmy.world 41 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn ~~off~~ on. That's how it should be.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 9 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I despise AI. I don't want it in my browser. If I want to use AI, I'll go to Mistral or Claude.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world -5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So no text to voice/voice to text, no translation, no ocr, no summarization, no scam detection? These are useful ai features to have in a browser IMO.

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Plugins exist. There is no excuse for bloat8ng the browser with these seldom used niche features by default, espexially when they represent 5% if what the AI component is doing and the other 95% are harmful to literally every living thing on the planet.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 7 hours ago

You mean the same Claude from Anthropic? The same Anthropic working with Palantir?

And then you are here shitting on Mozilla...

You guys are a joke!

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 hours ago

First, there should be a survey on what users actually want, no?

Because if no one wants AI and it's "always a choice", what you really do is waste considerable resources with as the only results, more settings users have to go through before starting using their browsers.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 24 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

there is absolutely zero reason to put ai in firefox

[–] scholar@lemmy.world 18 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Local ML translation was pretty cool

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

I like the convenience for languages I don't speak, but when I checked it for Hungarian (that I do speak) the results are so much worse than Google Translate or DeepL, basically literal translation word-by-word, often completely losing the meaning and tone of the sentence.

[–] drspectr@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

exactly it should be a firefox extension, anyone can install if they want it.

[–] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

It'd be nice if it integrated with my local ollama instance and let me pick which models I wanted to use on the fly with whatever part of the page I want.