this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
182 points (90.3% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1633 readers
174 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Context: PugJesus often spams low quality posts across the dozen or so communities they mod, apparently downvoting low effort spam on my frontpage is trolling. The only other action in the modlog is a different ban for 74 years for "Mass downvoting innocuous content," so it definitely seems they are just banning people that dislike their spam. Glad we're not missing out on the reddit mod experience here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I do, but I also like going on all to see what is out there. Unfortunately it can get buried when the same person is spamming a dozen submissions in a couple hours.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

Then block the user.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 9 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

sure but is downvoting bad content forbidden now?

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 10 hours ago

It's a pretty bad idea to down vote everything the mod of a community posts, even if it deserves it

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world -3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I think if you’re downvoting posts just because you feel the person sharing them is spamming, especially in a community you don’t contribute to, you should just block the person instead of putting a metaphorical thumb on the scale in community you don’t care about.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Are you not familiar with pug?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I am, I’ve never run into any issues with them personally.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Well I find that hard to believe, but that's not quite what I asked. I said are you familiar with them. More specifically how they post. Because you must know they post like 150 posts a day. Spamming simultaniously all across multiple communities usually very low effort brain rot quality posts. It is extremely easy to end up down voting a lot of their posts. In fact if you have any Integrity you probably are going to end up down voting a lot of their stuff.

Now I certainly agree that blocking them is the easier, and far more intelligent, option. However if you don't pay attention to who's posting things it's very easy not to realize you're down voting the same person over and over. And I don't think most people do. Unless they have that user tagged or something.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve found some of their history posts pretty enjoyable. Sorry I don’t live up to your idea of integrity, I guess? I just don’t see the appeal of browsing all if you don’t want to see dumb meme content here and there. Not even sure I see how this is especially an instance of power tripping as it sounds like pug did OP a favor considering they didn’t like any of the content on the community in question. I checked the grimdank mod log and there’s a grand total of two bans.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago

Oh from this comment I can see you and pug are two peas in a pod.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

so, it is forbidden? i'm not thinking of a particular user btw, although the one mentioned by op is quite power trippy, yea.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

I don’t see any specific rules for the grimdank community, but piefed.social does have this instance rule:

2. Spam and Malicious Behavior

  • No spamming, flooding, or advertising without permission. 
  • No scams, phishing attempts, or distribution of malware. 
  • No brigading, vote manipulation, or coordinated harassment.

I could see a case for arguing it’s vote manipulation, although I feel that’s kind of a reach. I just find it weird to get annoyed that someone is posting too much in a shitpost meme sub. Browsing the All feed and getting annoyed with that feels akin to going to a club and being annoyed there’s loud music. Just block the poster bothering you and move on.

[–] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's not forbidden, but also don't act surprised when whoever you're downvoting excludes you from their community, which shouldn't be a big loss to begin with.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

i mean, that's a bit of a power trip though ain't it?

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not really. Hypothetical: If someone who doesn’t like metal music enters !metal@lemmy.world and downvotes every post there - and commits themselves to doing it to every new post, this hurts their visibility across the Fediverse. Would you not say its reasonable, in this specific hypothetical, for the community owner to ban a user who does that?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

that's true but that's a very specific hypothetical i'm not sure happens that much.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Well I'll give you my own experience: When I was growing !television@lemm.ee before lemm.ee shut down, the community collected about 5 frequent downvoters. None of these accounts ever upvoted. They never participated by posting or commenting. In a few cases, two of the accounts had no posting history on the fediverse at all. They existed purely to downvote. Whether because they didn’t like television as a topic, or hated news articles being posted - I don’t know. But they would, between them, always downvote posts and sometimes do so early - deprecating their visibility.

Since moving to piefed after lemm.ee shut down, I've only had to do it again twice.

I think it’s reasonable for a community moderator to decide that these accounts are unwelcome and ban them.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

you are right, i don't think that's op's case though. do you think these accounts you describe might be just bots instead?

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Some of them did interact on the fediverse (although not on television). The ones with no posting/comment activity? No idea.

The point is that people really do behave like this.