this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
223 points (98.7% liked)

World News

51516 readers
1781 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Japanese region of Niigata is expected to endorse a decision to restart the world's largest nuclear power plant on Monday, a watershed moment in the country's pivot back to nuclear since the 2011 Fukushima disaster.

Kashiwazaki-Kariwa, located about 220 km (136 miles) northwest of Tokyo, was among 54 reactors shut after a massive earthquake and tsunami crippled the Fukushima Daiichi plant in the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Easy for me to say because we don't have Nuclear here but... probably the right choice.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I live not far from Fukushima (though I moved here about a decade after the disaster) and I agree. We have a huge affordability crisis going on with inflation/stagflation. Taking the nuclear plants offline caused reliance on fossil fuels, a lot of which were imported (including from Russia) and all that new cost had to be borne by someone which of course ended up being the consumers.

In an ideal world, we'd have more renewables and storage, but we're not there yet. Being mostly mountainous, at the boundary of 3 tectonic plates, and having plenty of natural disasters also doesn't help.

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The day earthquakes can get harnessed for energy

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Is the day billionaires outlaw earthquakes

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s a bit of an indirect approach, but we technically have that - for offshore quakes at least

[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah I think that's a moon thing. I don't think those would take in a tsunami.

[–] Noja@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Where does the uranium get imported from?

[–] Geologist@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I believe it’s Australia, Canada, and Khazakstan.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Also Uzbekistan and Namibia. There is also a list of countries with way smaller production numbers, like Russia, China, US, India, etc, but they're all collectively produce around 10% and sell less of that

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Mostly Canada.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

tbf, a nuclear power plant in a tsunami prone region is a bad idea.

I think nuclear energy is the way to go. at least use it to get rid of fossil fuel dependency, then we can continue to expand other renewables.

doing this is just calling for another Godzilla attack.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

a nuclear power plant in a tsunami prone region is a bad idea.

Not if the facility is built to deal with those outcomes, like tsunami and earthquakes. Fukushima design was criticized when built for ignoring safety in designs to save money.

technically every region has challenges that shouldn't be ignored.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair, it took an earthquake and a tsunami to hurt it.

false news, it was Godzilla.